MOTIVATION: Microarrays are becoming an increasingly common tool for observing changes in gene expression over a large cross section of the genome. This experimental tool is particularly valuable for understanding the genome-wide changes in gene transcription in response to thiazolidinedione (TZD) treatment. The TZD class of drugs is known to improve insulin-sensitivity in diabetic patients, and is clinically used in treatment regimens. In cells, TZDs bind to and activate the transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma). Large-scale array analyses will provide some insight into the mechanisms of TZD-mediated insulin sensitization. Unfortunately, a theoretical basis for analyzing array data has not kept pace with the rapid adoption of this tool. The methods that are commonly used, particularly the fold-change approach and the standard t-test, either lack statistical rigor or resort to generalized statistical models that do not accurately estimate variability at low replicate numbers. RESULTS: We introduce a statistical framework that models the dependence of measurement variance on the level of gene expression in the context of a Bayesian hierarchical model. We compare several methods of parameter estimation and subsequently apply these to determine a set of genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes that are differentially regulated in response to TZD treatment. When the number of experimental replicates is low (n = 2-3), this approach appears to qualitatively preserve an equivalent degree of specificity, while vastly improving sensitivity over other comparable methods. In addition, the statistical framework developed here can be readily applied to understand the implicit assumptions made in traditional fold-change approaches to array analysis.
MOTIVATION: Microarrays are becoming an increasingly common tool for observing changes in gene expression over a large cross section of the genome. This experimental tool is particularly valuable for understanding the genome-wide changes in gene transcription in response to thiazolidinedione (TZD) treatment. The TZD class of drugs is known to improve insulin-sensitivity in diabeticpatients, and is clinically used in treatment regimens. In cells, TZDs bind to and activate the transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma). Large-scale array analyses will provide some insight into the mechanisms of TZD-mediated insulin sensitization. Unfortunately, a theoretical basis for analyzing array data has not kept pace with the rapid adoption of this tool. The methods that are commonly used, particularly the fold-change approach and the standard t-test, either lack statistical rigor or resort to generalized statistical models that do not accurately estimate variability at low replicate numbers. RESULTS: We introduce a statistical framework that models the dependence of measurement variance on the level of gene expression in the context of a Bayesian hierarchical model. We compare several methods of parameter estimation and subsequently apply these to determine a set of genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes that are differentially regulated in response to TZD treatment. When the number of experimental replicates is low (n = 2-3), this approach appears to qualitatively preserve an equivalent degree of specificity, while vastly improving sensitivity over other comparable methods. In addition, the statistical framework developed here can be readily applied to understand the implicit assumptions made in traditional fold-change approaches to array analysis.
Authors: Sayaka Inokuchi-Shimizu; Eek Joong Park; Yoon Seok Roh; Ling Yang; Bi Zhang; Jingyi Song; Shuang Liang; Michael Pimienta; Koji Taniguchi; Xuefeng Wu; Kinji Asahina; William Lagakos; Mason R Mackey; Shizuo Akira; Mark H Ellisman; Dorothy D Sears; Jerrold M Olefsky; Michael Karin; David A Brenner; Ekihiro Seki Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Mara H Sherman; Ruth T Yu; Tiffany W Tseng; Cristovao M Sousa; Sihao Liu; Morgan L Truitt; Nanhai He; Ning Ding; Christopher Liddle; Annette R Atkins; Mathias Leblanc; Eric A Collisson; John M Asara; Alec C Kimmelman; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Satish A Eraly; Volker Vallon; Timo Rieg; Jon A Gangoiti; William R Wikoff; Gary Siuzdak; Bruce A Barshop; Sanjay K Nigam Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Annie E Hill-Baskin; Maciej M Markiewski; David A Buchner; Haifeng Shao; David DeSantis; Gene Hsiao; Shankar Subramaniam; Nathan A Berger; Colleen Croniger; John D Lambris; Joseph H Nadeau Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Colin T Walsh; Julie Radeff-Huang; Rosalia Matteo; Albert Hsiao; Shankar Subramaniam; Dwayne Stupack; Joan Heller Brown Journal: FASEB J Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 5.191