M G Frei1, I Osorio. 1. Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C., Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if stimulation of the left vagus nerve (LVNS) with the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP) in humans is, as claimed in the literature, without cardiac chronotropic actions. METHODS: We analyzed 228 h of ECG recorded from five subjects with intractable epilepsy who had not benefited from LVNS, for effects on instantaneous heart rate (IHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: There were two main cardiac responses: (a) bradycardia, and (b) tachycardia during the first half, followed by bradycardia during the second half of stimulation (biphasic response). Multiphasic responses characterized by alternating bradycardia and tachycardia were rarely observed. HRV was either increased or decreased depending on the subject and on the stimulation parameters. HRV as a function of HR also showed high interindividual variability, and interestingly, in one case behaved paradoxically, increasing at higher and decreasing at lower heart rates. CONCLUSIONS: LVNS at high intensities has complex effects on IHR and HRV, which show large interindividual variability. These spectra of cardiac responses reflect the interplay of autonomic, visceral, and somatic sensory afferences and the role of central structures in their integration. These findings also point to the need for more comprehensive studies of cardiac function in humans implanted with the NCP, using sensitive methods for data processing and analysis such as those developed for this study.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if stimulation of the left vagus nerve (LVNS) with the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP) in humans is, as claimed in the literature, without cardiac chronotropic actions. METHODS: We analyzed 228 h of ECG recorded from five subjects with intractable epilepsy who had not benefited from LVNS, for effects on instantaneous heart rate (IHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: There were two main cardiac responses: (a) bradycardia, and (b) tachycardia during the first half, followed by bradycardia during the second half of stimulation (biphasic response). Multiphasic responses characterized by alternating bradycardia and tachycardia were rarely observed. HRV was either increased or decreased depending on the subject and on the stimulation parameters. HRV as a function of HR also showed high interindividual variability, and interestingly, in one case behaved paradoxically, increasing at higher and decreasing at lower heart rates. CONCLUSIONS: LVNS at high intensities has complex effects on IHR and HRV, which show large interindividual variability. These spectra of cardiac responses reflect the interplay of autonomic, visceral, and somatic sensory afferences and the role of central structures in their integration. These findings also point to the need for more comprehensive studies of cardiac function in humans implanted with the NCP, using sensitive methods for data processing and analysis such as those developed for this study.
Authors: Atsuko Seki; Hunter R Green; Thomas D Lee; LongSheng Hong; Jian Tan; Harry V Vinters; Peng-Sheng Chen; Michael C Fishbein Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Markus Rauchenzauner; Edda Haberlandt; Martin Ortler; Tobias Tatarczyk; Markus Laimer; Eugen Trinka; Gerhard Luef Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 4.849