Literature DB >> 15217308

An economic evaluation of fluvastatin used for the prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention in the UK.

Paul A Scuffham1, Stephen Chaplin.   

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the costs, benefits and cost effectiveness, from the UK NHS perspective, of fluvastatin (relative to no HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor [statin]) for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiac events following a successful first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken using efficacy data from the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS). LIPS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 77 centres (predominantly in Europe). Patients included in the trial had moderate hypercholesterolaemia and had successfully undergone their first PCI. Fluvastatin (Lescol) 40 mg twice daily plus dietary counselling was given to the intervention group for up to 4 years; the control group received dietary counselling only. A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental costs per QALY gained over a 10-year period, with cost data drawn from the UK NHS (2002 values). Monte Carlo simulations and multivariate analysis were used to assess uncertainty. Costs were discounted at 6% per annum, and health outcomes at 1.5% per annum.
RESULTS: On average, treatment with fluvastatin cost an additional pound 300 (SD pound 303) [euro 423; SD euro 428] per patient and resulted in an additional 0.092 (SD 0.06) QALYs per patient over 10 years compared with controls. The incremental cost per QALY gained with fluvastatin versus the control group was pound 3207 (SD pound 5,497) [euro 4,527; SD euro 7,759]. Fluvastatin was dominant (better outcomes and lower costs) in 15.9% of the simulations and was dominated in 2.9%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were: the effectiveness of fluvastatin in reducing acute myocardial infarction, subsequent PCI, coronary artery bypass graft and cardiac deaths; the utility weight associated with a subsequent post-PCI state; the cost of fluvastatin; and the time horizon evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin is the only statin which has proven effective in preventing major coronary adverse events in new PCI patients; other statins lack this evidence. This Markov model, with its underlying assumptions and data, suggests that fluvastatin is a viable and economically efficient pharmaceutical (relative to no statin) to reduce heart disease in the UK when given routinely to all patients following PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15217308     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422080-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  17 in total

Review 1.  Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Niklas Zethraeus; Magnus Johannesson; Bengt Jönsson; Mickael Löthgren; Magnus Tambour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Greiner; Tom Weijnen; Martin Nieuwenhuizen; Siem Oppe; Xavier Badia; Jan Busschbach; Martin Buxton; Paul Dolan; Paul Kind; Paul Krabbe; Arto Ohinmaa; David Parkin; Montserat Roset; Harri Sintonen; Aki Tsuchiya; Frank de Charro
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2003-09

3.  Therapeutic options and cost considerations in the treatment of ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  J G Cleland; A Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.727

4.  Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994-5. United Kingdom Heart Attack Study Collaborative Group.

Authors:  R M Norris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  C J Troche; J Tacke; B Hinzpeter; M Danner; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option?

Authors:  J G Cleland; A Walker
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics.

Authors:  L A Prosser; A A Stinnett; P A Goldman; L W Williams; M G Hunink; L Goldman; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol concentration with statins in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease: life table method applied to health authority population.

Authors:  P D Pharoah; W Hollingworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-08

9.  Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick W J C Serruys; Pim de Feyter; Carlos Macaya; Norbert Kokott; Jacques Puel; Matthias Vrolix; Angelo Branzi; Marcelo C Bertolami; Graham Jackson; Bradley Strauss; Bernhard Meier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness of statins.

Authors:  D M Huse; M W Russell; J D Miller; D F Kraemer; R B D'Agostino; R C Ellison; S C Hartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of health care models for coronary heart disease interventions.

Authors:  K Cooper; S C Brailsford; R Davies; J Raftery
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  Economic evaluations of cholesterol-lowering drugs: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Pearl D Gumbs; Monique W M Verschuren; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Ardine G de Wit; Anthonius de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Secondary prevention after PCI: the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  S Chaplin; P A Scuffham; M Alon; G van den Boom
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Outcomes-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lipid-Lowering Therapies.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wei; Ruben G W Quek; Guillermo Villa; Shravanthi R Gandra; Carol A Forbes; Steve Ryder; Nigel Armstrong; Sohan Deshpande; Steven Duffy; Jos Kleijnen; Peter Lindgren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Fluvastatin for lowering lipids.

Authors:  Stephen P Adams; Sarpreet S Sekhon; Michael Tsang; James M Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK.

Authors:  Virginia Becerra; Alfredo Gracia; Kamal Desai; Seye Abogunrin; Sarah Brand; Ruth Chapman; Fernando García Alonso; Valentín Fuster; Ginés Sanz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Potential economic consequences of a cardioprotective agent for patients with myocardial infarction: modelling study.

Authors:  Talitha I Verhoef; Stephen Morris; Anthony Mathur; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.