Literature DB >> 15215802

Incremental value of cardiac imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and without ST-segment elevation: a multicenter study.

Sanjiv Kaul1, Roxy Senior, Christian Firschke, Xin-Qun Wang, Jonathan Lindner, Flordeliza S Villanueva, Soroosh Firozan, Michael C Kontos, Allen Taylor, Ian J Nixon, Denny D Watson, Frank E Harrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that imaging of regional myocardial function (RF) and perfusion (PER) will add incremental value for both diagnosis and short-term prognosis to routine demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic findings in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and without ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram.
METHODS: We compared contrast echocardiography (CE) with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for this purpose. Both CE and SPECT readings included separate and composite assessments of both RF and PER. Adverse events in the first 48 hours after ED presentation included acute myocardial infarction, emergent revascularization, and cardiac-related death.
RESULTS: Concordance between CE and SPECT was 77% (73% to 82%) for all territories, with a higher concordance for the anterior wall of 84% (78% to 89%). Of the 203 patients recruited for the study, 38 (19%) had a cardiac event within 48 hours of ED presentation: 21 had acute myocardial infarction, 16 underwent an urgent revascularization procedure, and 1 died. In multivariate logistic regression models, the number of abnormal segments on CE and SPECT were significant predictors (P <.05) of cardiac events. The composite scores on CE provided 17% incremental information (P =.009, n = 203) and gated SPECT provided 23.5% additional information (P =.020, n = 163) for predicting cardiac events compared with routine demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic variables. RF and composite evaluation was superior on SPECT compared with CE, whereas PER alone was not.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac imaging of RF and PER at the time of ED presentation offers substantially greater diagnostic and prognostic information for early cardiac events in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain and no ST elevation than does the routine demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215802     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of non-invasive imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  C Roobottom; G Mitchell; S Iyengar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Cardiac imaging in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

Authors:  Jared J Wyrick; Kevin Wei
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Value of simultaneous functional assessment in association with acute rest perfusion imaging for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Anthony Haney; Joseph P Ornato; Robert L Jesse; James L Tatum
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Imaging techniques for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Devang M Dave; Maros Ferencic; Udo Hoffmann; James E Udelson
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.200

Review 5.  Cardiac CT in the emergency department: convincing evidence, but cautious implementation.

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Carol Mascioli; Jonathon Fialkow; Paul Andrulonis; Tomas Villanueva; Constantino S Pena; Warren R Janowitz; Barry T Katzen; Jack A Ziffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in the acute care setting: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Michael C Kontos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: methodology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography versus rest sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Soo-Jin Kang; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jong-Min Song; Jae-Kwan Song; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-06-30

9.  Contrast echocardiography in Canada: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Echocardiography position paper.

Authors:  George Honos; Robert Amyot; Jonathan Choy; Howard Leong-Poi; Greg Schnell; Eric Yu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 10.  Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.