Literature DB >> 18984452

Value of simultaneous functional assessment in association with acute rest perfusion imaging for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Michael C Kontos1, Anthony Haney, Joseph P Ornato, Robert L Jesse, James L Tatum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rest tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has significant utility for clinical decision making in emergency department chest pain patients. The role of functional data, commonly acquired with perfusion, has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Low- to moderate-risk patients undergoing rest MPI for risk stratification were included. The patients' MPI findings were classified as normal (normal perfusion or function), abnormal (perfusion defect with abnormal regional function), or discordant (perfusion defect with normal regional function). Ejection fraction was determined from the gated MPI studies. Events based on perfusion classifications and ejection fraction were evaluated. A total of 2,826 consecutive patients (abnormal MPI results in 40%, normal in 32%, and discordant in 27%) were studied. Outcomes were similar for those with normal MPI results versus those with discordant MPI results (myocardial infarction [MI] based on troponin I [TnI], 3.5% vs 4.0%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 1.5% vs 1.7%; revascularization, 5.2% vs 5.5%; and MI/revascularization based on TnI, 7.9% vs 8.1%) (P = not significant for all). Both groups had significantly fewer events (P < .001 for all) when compared with patients with abnormal MPI studies (MI based on TnI, 15%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 10%; revascularization, 17%; MI based on TnI or revascularization, 24%). The mortality rate was not different among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that mild/moderate and severe systolic dysfunction were independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality rates (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent evaluation of perfusion and function (regional and global) with MPI provides significant risk/outcome predictive power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984452     DOI: 10.1007/BF03007358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  33 in total

1.  Scores for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification in the community.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Guy S Reeder; Steven J Jacobsen; Susan Weston; Jill Killian; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Improvement of systolic and diastolic left ventricular wall motion by serial echocardiograms in selected patients treated for unstable angina.

Authors:  C de Zwaan; E C Cheriex; S H Braat; J L Stappers; H J Wellens
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated with gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with normal exercise test results: influence of tracer, gender, and acquisition camera.

Authors:  A A Ababneh; R R Sciacca; B Kim; S R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Angiographic and scintigraphic (perfusion and electrocardiogram-gated SPECT) correlates of clinical presentation in unstable angina.

Authors:  A Emre; B Ersek; M Gürsürer; M Aksoy; T Siber; O Engin; K Yeşilçimen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient.

Authors:  J L Tatum; R L Jesse; M C Kontos; C S Nicholson; K L Schmidt; C S Roberts; J P Ornato
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Regional wall motion improvement after coronary thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: importance of coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  E J Topol; J L Weiss; J A Brinker; K P Brin; S O Gottlieb; L C Becker; B H Bulkley; N Chandra; J T Flaherty; G Gerstenblith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact.

Authors:  E G DePuey; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Frequency, patient characteristics, and outcomes of mild-to-moderate heart failure complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: lessons from 4 international fibrinolytic therapy trials.

Authors:  David Hasdai; Eric J Topol; Rakhi Kilaru; Alexander Battler; Robert A Harrington; Alec Vahanian; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher B Granger; Frans Van de Werf; Maarten L Simoons; Christopher M O'connor; David R Holmes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging techniques for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Devang M Dave; Maros Ferencic; Udo Hoffmann; James E Udelson
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.200

Review 2.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in the acute care setting: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Michael C Kontos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Deborah B Diercks; J Douglas Kirk
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.