Literature DB >> 15214217

The influence of drill wear on cutting efficiency and heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability.

Carlo Ercoli1, Paul D Funkenbusch, Han-Joo Lee, Mark E Moss, Gerald N Graser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated, under conditions simulating implant placement, the cutting efficiency, durability, heat production, and wear of implant drills.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteotomies were performed on bovine ribs using a surgical unit mounted in a testing apparatus. A software program controlled the apparatus and recorded temperatures, depths, and drilling times. Seven brands of drills were tested (Nobel Biocare, 3i/Implant Innovations, Steri-Oss, Paragon, Implamed, Lifecore, and ITI). Spade, twist, tri-flute, and TiN-coated drill designs were evaluated and compared during 100 successive osteotomies. Scanning electron microscopic and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopic examinations were performed, and hardness was measured.
RESULTS: Two 2-mm drills (Nobel Biocare and 3i/Implant Innovations) had mean removal rates significantly greater than the others (P < .05). The 2-mm twist drill design with a low hardness (Implamed) exhibited plastic deformation at the cutting edge, loss of cutting efficiency, and drill fracture. The TiN-coated drills (Steri-Oss and Paragon) showed greater wear and significantly lower removal rates (P < .05) than noncoated drills. Temperature increases with different drills were not significantly different at depths of 5 or 15 mm or between 2-mm or 3-mm drills. With 1 exception (the 2.3-mm Paragon drill at a depth of 15 mm), the temperatures generated by the different types of drills were not significantly different. Clinically harmful temperatures were detected only at a depth of 15 mm during 5 osteotomies and coincided with a marked decrease in the rate of drill advancement with a resulting continuous drilling action. DISCUSSION: Temperatures generated at depths of 5 and 15 mm by the different drill types and diameters were not significantly different and, with only 5 exceptions, were clinically safe. Several differences between brands were noted in regard to cutting efficiency and durability, underscoring the importance of material selection and quality on drill performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Drill design, material, and mechanical properties significantly affect cutting efficiency and durability. Coolant availability and temperature were the predominant factors in determining bone temperatures. Implant drills can be used several times without resulting in bone temperatures that are potentially harmful. Continuous drilling in deep osteotomies can produce local temperatures that might be harmful to the bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15214217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  28 in total

1.  Study of temperature variation in cortical bone during osteotomies with trephine drills.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Marcelo Khoury Pazetto; Sérgio de Oliveira; Stefano Corbella; Silvio Taschieri; Fábio E C Mardegan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drills.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-18

3.  Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants.

Authors:  Uta Scherer; Marcus Stoetzer; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Constantin von See
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Identification of possible factors influencing temperatures elevation during implant site preparation with piezoelectric technique.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Orlando Brugnoletti; Girolamo Garreffa; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-02-09

5.  Effect of irrigation and stainless steel drills on dental implant bed heat generation.

Authors:  B Bullon; E F Bueno; M Herrero; A Fernandez-Palacin; J V Rios; P Bullon; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Surgical Drill Bit Design and Thermomechanical Damage in Bone Drilling: A Review.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Ali Akhbar; Akmal Wani Sulong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery.

Authors:  D P Laverty; J Buglass; A Patel
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures.

Authors:  Nadine Marheineke; Uta Scherer; Martin Rücker; Constantin von See; Björn Rahlf; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Marcus Stoetzer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Temperature changes during cortical bone drilling with a newly designed step drill and an internally cooled drill.

Authors:  Goran Augustin; Slavko Davila; Toma Udilljak; Tomislav Staroveski; Danko Brezak; Slaven Babic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Drilling of bone: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Rupesh Kumar Pandey; S S Panda
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.