Literature DB >> 3448226

Variation in general practitioners' referral rates to consultants.

D Wilkin, A G Smith.   

Abstract

The variation in the number of patients general practitioners refer to hospital is a source of concern because of the costs generated and the implications for quality and quantity of care This paper compares 32 general practitioners with high referral rates with 35 doctors with low referral rates drawn from a study of 201 doctors. The mean referral rate for all 201 doctors was 6.6 per 100 consultations - for those with high referral rates the mean was 11.8 and for those with low referral rates 2.9. Differences between doctors with high and low referral rates with respect to age, sex, social class and diagnostic case mix of patients consulting were small. Doctors with high referral rates referred more patients in all categories. There were also few differences between the two groups with respect to the characteristics of the doctors themselves or their practices. The findings are discussed in the context of proposals to provide general practitioners with information on their own referral rates compared with those of other doctors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3448226      PMCID: PMC1711021     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  6 in total

1.  A Hospital Outpatient Referral Survey: A Study of the Referral Habits of a Group of General Practitioners.

Authors:  C J Starey
Journal:  J Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1961-05

2.  Referrals to hospitals in an East Midlands city--a medical audit.

Authors:  R C Fraser; H R Patterson; E Peacock
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-05

3.  Referral to hospital by general practitioners.

Authors:  D C Morrell; H G Gage; N A Robinson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1971-02

4.  Are the problems of primary care in inner cities fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Wood
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-04-02

5.  Area variations in the process of care in urban general practice.

Authors:  D Wilkin; D H Metcalfe; L Hallam; M Cooke; P K Hodgkin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-28

6.  Do general practitioners have different "referral thresholds"?

Authors:  R O Cummins; B Jarman; P M White
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-03-28
  6 in total
  40 in total

1.  Factors explaining the use of psychiatric services by general practices.

Authors:  D Melzer; L Watters; E Paykel; K Singh; N Gormley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Referral for minor mental illness: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S Nandy; C Chalmers-Watson; M Gantley; M Underwood
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Clinical guidelines. Report of a local initiative. Introduction.

Authors:  A Haines; B Hurwitz
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12

4.  A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists.

Authors:  R F Westerman; F M Hull; P D Bezemer; G Gort
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  General practitioner referral rates to district psychiatry and psychology services.

Authors:  F Creed; J Gowrisunkur; E Russell; J Kincey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Impact of an interest in asthma on prescribing costs in general practice.

Authors:  K Jones
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

7.  Comparing trainer and trainee referral rates: implications for education and allocation of resources.

Authors:  A Rashid; C Jagger
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Rethinking medical audit: the goal is efficiency.

Authors:  G Mooney; M Ryan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The future of general practice. Caring for larger lists.

Authors:  G N Marsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-23

10.  Quality of general practitioner referrals to outpatient departments: assessment by specialists and a general practitioner.

Authors:  R M Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.