Literature DB >> 15210269

Medical students' views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills.

Charlotte Rees1, Charlotte Sheard, Amy McPherson.   

Abstract

This study aims to explore undergraduate medical students' views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills. Five focus groups were conducted with 32 students, with representatives from each of the 5 years of the medical degree, at the University of Nottingham, UK. The audiotapes were transcribed in full and the transcripts were theme analysed independently by two analysts. Two themes relating to methods of teaching and learning communication skills emerged from the analysis. Students had mixed views about instructional methods of teaching and learning communication skills such as lectures. Students seemed to prefer experiential methods of learning communication skills such as role-playing with simulated patients and communicating with real patients in a clinical context. These findings have a number of educational and research implications and these are discussed in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15210269     DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00196-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  15 in total

1.  Training Methods for Delivering Difficult News in Genetic Counseling and Genetics Residency Training Programs.

Authors:  Laila Andoni; Wendy L Hobson; John C Carey; Karin M Dent
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  An interactive e-learning module to promote bio-psycho-social management of low back pain in healthcare professionals: a pilot study.

Authors:  Antoine Fourré; Auriane Fierens; Jef Michielsen; Laurence Ris; Frédéric Dierick; Nathalie Roussel
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-10-22

3.  Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect.

Authors:  Hans M Bosse; Martin Nickel; Sören Huwendiek; Jana Jünger; Jobst H Schultz; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Standardized Patients versus Volunteer Patients for Physical Therapy Students' Interviewing Practice: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sue Murphy; Bita Imam; Donna L MacIntyre
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  NeoAct: A Randomized Prospective Pilot Study on Communication Skill Training of Neonatologists.

Authors:  Katharina Bibl; Michael Wagner; Philipp Steinbauer; Peter Gröpel; Sabrina Wimmer; Monika Olischar; Angelika Berger; Birgit Hladschik-Kermer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Feedback on video recorded consultations in medical teaching: why students loathe and love it - a focus-group based qualitative study.

Authors:  Stein Nilsen; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Medical educators' perception of communication training with simulated patients: an explorative study approach.

Authors:  Simone Alvarez; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-29

8.  Development and psychometric evaluation of scales to measure professional confidence in manual medicine: a Rasch measurement approach.

Authors:  Mark D Hecimovich; Irene Styles; Simone E Volet
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-06-04

9.  Barriers to Effective Doctor-Patient Relationship Based on PRECEDE PROCEED Model.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghaffarifar; Fazlollah Ghofranipour; Fazlollah Ahmadi; Manouchehr Khoshbaten
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-03-25

10.  "Helping someone with a skill sharpens it in your own mind": a mixed method study exploring health professions students experiences of Peer Assisted Learning (PAL).

Authors:  Sandra E Carr; Gabrielle Brand; Li Wei; Helen Wright; Pam Nicol; Helene Metcalfe; Julie Saunders; John Payne; Liza Seubert; Laurie Foley
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.