Literature DB >> 15209196

Quantifying risk of adverse clinical events with one set of vital signs among primary care patients with hypertension.

William M Tierney1, Margaret Brunt, Joseph Kesterson, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Gil L'Italien, Pablo Lapuerta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is often uncontrolled. One reason might be physicians' reticence to modify therapy in response to single office measurements of vital signs.
METHODS: Using electronic records from an inner-city primary care practice, we extracted information about vital signs, diagnoses, test results, and drug therapy available on the first primary care visit in 1993 for patients with hypertension. We then identified multivariable predictors of subsequent vascular complications in the ensuing 5 years.
RESULTS: Of 5,825 patients (mean age 57 years) previously treated for hypertension for 5.6 years, 7% developed myocardial infarctions, 17% had strokes, 24% developed ischemic heart disease, 22% had heart failure, 12% developed renal insufficiency, and 13% died in 5 years. Controlling for other clinical data, a 10-mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure was associated with 13% increased risk (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-21%) of renal insufficiency, 9% (95% CI, 3%-15%) increased risk of ischemic heart disease, 7% (95% CI, 3%-11%) increased risk of stroke, and 6% (95% CI, 2%-9%) increased risk of first stroke or myocardial infarction. A 10-mmHg elevation in mean blood pressure predicted a 12% (95% CI, 5%-20%) increased risk of heart failure. An increase in heart rate of 10 beats per minute predicted a 16% (95% CI, 2%-5%) increased risk of death. Diastolic blood pressure predicted only a 13% (95% CI, 4%-23%) increased risk of first stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Vital signs-especially systolic blood pressure-recorded routinely during a single primary care visit had significant prognostic value for multiple adverse clinical events among patients treated for hypertension and should not be ignored by clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209196      PMCID: PMC1466672          DOI: 10.1370/afm.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  41 in total

1.  Cardiovascular disease costs associated with uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  John M Flack; Roman Casciano; Julian Casciano; James Doyle; Steven Arikian; Simon Tang; Raul Arocho
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  2002-11

2.  Time trends in high blood pressure control and the use of antihypertensive medications in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Teri A Manolio; Nicholas L Smith; Susan R Heckbert; John S Gottdiener; Gregory L Burke; Joel Weissfeld; Paul Enright; Thomas Lumley; Neil Powe; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-11

3.  Computer predictions of abnormal test results. Effects on outpatient testing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; S L Hui; D K Martin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Discriminant function analysis of factors related to myocardial infarction in male patients on antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  A H Smith; F O Simpson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1976-11

6.  Renal disease in hypertensive adults: effect of race and type II diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; F C Luft
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Systolic blood pressure is the main etiology for poorly controlled hypertension.

Authors:  Muhammad G Alam; Yousri M Barri
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Different drug classes have variable effects on blood pressure depending on the time of day.

Authors:  Trefor O Morgan; Adrianne Anderson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Cardiovascular risk in white-coat and sustained hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Hilde Celis; Jan A Staessen; Lutgarde Thijs; Frank Buntinx; Marc De Buyzere; Elly Den Hond; Robert H Fagard; Eoin T O'Brien
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Using clinical data to predict abnormal serum electrolytes and blood cell profiles.

Authors:  W M Tierney; D K Martin; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prehypertension, patient outcomes, and the knowledge base of family medicine.

Authors:  Lee Green
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks.

Authors:  Wilson D Pace; Elizabeth W Staton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Prevalence of inadequate blood pressure control among veterans after acute ischemic stroke hospitalization: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Christianne L Roumie; Susan Ofner; Joseph S Ross; Greg Arling; Linda S Williams; Diana L Ordin; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-06-21

4.  Resting heart rate and coronary artery calcium in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Matthew A Allison; Joann E Manson; Aaron Aragaki; Charles B Eaton; Judith Hsai; Lawrence Phillips; Lewis Kuller; Maurizio Trevisan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Association of hepatitis C virus infection with prevalence and development of kidney disease.

Authors:  Sharon M Moe; A J Pampalone; Susan Ofner; Marc Rosenman; Evgenia Teal; Siu L Hui
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  A cost evaluation of the Georgia Stroke and Heart Attack Prevention Program.

Authors:  David B Rein; Roberta T Constantine; Diane Orenstein; Hong Chen; Patricia Jones; J Nell Brownstein; Rosanne Farris
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Comparative effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Hisham Aljadhey; Wanzhu Tu; Richard A Hansen; Susan J Blalock; D Craig Brater; Michael D Murray
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.