Literature DB >> 15208008

Dimensional limits for arthropod eyes with superposition optics.

Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow1, József Gál.   

Abstract

An essential feature of the superposition type of compound eye is the presence of a wide zone, which is transparent and devoid of pigment and interposed between the distal array of dioptric elements and the proximally placed photoreceptive layer. Parallel rays, collected by many lenses, must (through reflection or refraction) cross this transparent clear-zone in such a way that they become focused on one receptor. Superposition depends mostly on diameter and curvature of the cornea, size and shape of the crystalline cone, lens cylinder properties of cornea and cone, dimensions of the receptor cells, and width of the clear-zone. We examined the role of the latter by geometrical, geometric-optical, and anatomical measurements and concluded that a minimal size exists, below which effective superposition can no longer occur. For an eye of a given size, it is not possible to increase the width of the clear-zone cz=dcz/R1 and decrease R2 (i.e., the radius of curvature of the distal retinal surface) and/or c=dc/R1 without reaching a limit. In the equations 'cz' is the width of the clear-zone dcz relative to the radius R1 of the eye and c is the length of the cornea-cone unit relative to R1. Our results provide one explanation as to why apposition eyes exist in very small scarabaeid beetles, when generally the taxon Scarabaeoidea is characterized by the presence of superposition eyes. The results may also provide the answer for the puzzle why juveniles or the young of species, in which the adults possess superposition (=clear-zone) eyes, frequently bear eyes that do not contain a clear zone, but resemble apposition eyes. The eyes of the young and immature specimens may simply be too small to permit superposition to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15208008     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Eye and wing structure closely reflects the visual ecology of dung beetles.

Authors:  Claudia Tocco; Marie Dacke; Marcus Byrne
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Ontogenetic adaptations in the visual systems of deep-sea crustaceans.

Authors:  Tamara M Frank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Structure and Ultrastructure of the Acrotrichis grandicollis (Coleoptera: Ptiliidae) Compound Eyes and the Eye Features Related to Miniaturisation.

Authors:  A A Makarova; A A Polilov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-16

4.  External morphology of eyes and Nebenaugen of caridean decapods-ecological and systematic considerations.

Authors:  Magnus L Johnson; Nicola Dobson; Sammy De Grave
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Palaeoecology of Voulteryon parvulus (Eucrustacea, Polychelida) from the Middle Jurassic of La Voulte-sur-Rhône Fossil-Lagerstätte (France).

Authors:  Denis Audo; Ninon Robin; Javier Luque; Michal Krobicki; Joachim T Haug; Carolin Haug; Clément Jauvion; Sylvain Charbonnier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Allometric scaling of a superposition eye optimizes sensitivity and acuity in large and small hawkmoths.

Authors:  Anna Stöckl; Rebecca Grittner; Gavin Taylor; Christoph Rau; Andrew J Bodey; Almut Kelber; Emily Baird
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.