Literature DB >> 15207957

Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE Trial.

Michael A Weber1, Stevo Julius, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Hans R Brunner, Steffan Ekman, Lennart Hansson, Tsushung Hua, John H Laragh, Gordon T McInnes, Lada Mitchell, Francis Plat, M Anthony Schork, Beverly Smith, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was designed to test whether, for the same achieved blood pressures, regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine would have differing effects on cardiovascular endpoints in high risk hypertension. But inequalities in blood pressure, favouring amlodipine, throughout the multiyear trial precluded comparison of outcomes. A technique of serial median matching, applied at 6 months when treatment adjustments intended to achieve control of blood pressure were complete, created 5006 valsartan-amlodipine patient pairs matched exactly for systolic blood pressure, age, sex, and the presence or absence of previous coronary disease, stroke, or diabetes. Subsequent combined cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality were almost identical in the two cohorts, but admission to hospital for heart failure was significantly lower with valsartan. Reaching blood pressure control (systolic <140 mm Hg) by 6 months, independent of drug type, was associated with significant benefits for subsequent major outcomes; the blood pressure response after just 1 month of treatment predicted events and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207957     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16456-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  137 in total

Review 1.  Should two-drug initial therapy for hypertension be recommended for all patients?

Authors:  Jennifer B Cowart; Addison A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Putting ACCOMPLISH into context: management of hypertension in 2010.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Robert J Herman; Nadia A Khan; Simon W Rabkin; Norm Campbell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Hypertension: BP reduction in patients with diabetes--uncertainties remain.

Authors:  Michael A Weber
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  VALUE in hypertension treatment.

Authors:  Bradford C Berk; John D Bisognano
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  [Blood pressure independent effects of antihypertensive agents].

Authors:  U Wenzel; G Wolf
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Prevention of cardiovascular events and diabetes with angiotensin-receptor blockers in hypertension: LIFE, SCOPE, and VALUE.

Authors:  Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arne S Westheim; Ingrid Os
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Are the elderly different? Factors influencing mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation.

Authors:  J Schröder; U Müller-Werdan; S Reuter; A Vogt; M Schlitt; U Raaz; I Reindl; M Buerke; K Werdan; A Schlitt
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 8.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Benjamin J Epstein; Katherine Vogel; Biff F Palmer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  Catherine M Brown; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Successful treatment of hypertension accounts for improvements in markers of diastolic function - a pilot study comparing hydrochlorothiazide-based and amlodipine-based treatment strategies.

Authors:  Kofo O Ogunyankin; Andrew G Day
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.