| Literature DB >> 15207071 |
Urvashi Balbir Singh1, Naga Suresh, N Vijaya Bhanu, Jyoti Arora, Hema Pant, Sanjeev Sinha, Ram Charan Aggarwal, Sushma Singh, Jitendra Nath Pande, Christophe Sola, Nalin Rastogi, Pradeep Seth.
Abstract
One hundred five Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from the Delhi area were typed by spoligotyping; 45 patterns were identified. Comparison with an international spoligotype database showed type 26, Delhi type (22%), type 54 (12%), and type 1, Beijing type (8%), as the most common. Eighteen spoligotypes did not match any existing database pattern.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15207071 PMCID: PMC3323169 DOI: 10.3201/eid1006.030575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of patients harboring clustered versus nonclustered strainsa
| Parameters | No. (%) of patients in | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clustered group | Nonclustered group | OR for clustering (95% CI) | p value | |
| Age, y | ||||
| 15–45 | 63 (81) | 15 (19) | 4.52 (1.6 to 12.96) | 0.001 |
| >46 | 13 (48) | 14 (52) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 53 (72) | 21 (28) | 0.88 (0.30 to 2.49) | NS |
| Female | 23 (74) | 8 (26) | ||
| HIV status | ||||
| Seropositive | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | UD | |
| Seronegative | 74 (72) | 29 (28) | ||
| Previous history of TB | ||||
| No previous therapy | 52 (80) | 13 (20) | 2.53 (0.89 to 7.22) | 0.05 |
| Previously treated | 19 (61) | 12 (39) | ||
| Drug resistance | ||||
| Drug resistanceb | 22 (71) | 6 (29) | 1.56 (0.51 to 4.97) | NS |
| Susceptible to all drugs | 54 (70) | 23 (30) | ||
| Radiologic findings | ||||
| Extensive cavitary | 12 (76) | 5 (24) | 1.6 (0.33 to 11.22) | NS |
| Limited cavitary | 6 (60) | 4 (40) | ||
| Sputum smear positive | ||||
| 1–10 AFB/10–100 fields | 30 (73) | 11 (27) | 0.96 (0.34 to 2.70) | NS |
| >1 AFB per field | 37 (74) | 13 (26) | ||
aOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TB, tuberculosis; NS, not statistically significant; UD, undefined; AFB, acid-fast bacilli. bResistance to one or more drugs.
FigureDendrogram built on 105 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Delhi based on spoligotyping results using the Taxotron software package (PAD Grimont, Taxolab, Institut Pasteur, Paris). This phylogenetic tree, based on the 1-Jaccard Index () and drawn using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA), shows the presence of five major shared types (ST) of spoligotypes in Delhi; ST26 (Central Asian Family 1 or CAS1), ST1 (Beijing Family), ST54 (also newly designated as T1 ancestor), ST119 (X1 family) and ST11 (East African Indian 3 or EAI3 family). The strain designation appears left of the binary spoligotyping profile, and shared-type designations appear on the right of the spoligotype. Orphan patterns (unique isolates) have not been provided with a spoligotype designation on this tree.
Predominant spoligotype prevalent in Delhi and shared type designations for 10 unique isolates, clade designation, and initial description (reference)
| Spoligotype designation | Spoligotype pattern | Cladea | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predominant spoligotype | |||
| Type 26 |
| Casi (Delhi) |
|
| Type 54 |
| Manu |
|
| Type 1 |
| Beijing |
|
| Shared spoligotype | |||
| Type 50 |
| H3 |
|
| Type 52 |
| T2 |
|
| Type 53 |
| T1 |
|
| Type 138 |
| Eai |
|
| Type 141 |
| Cas1 |
|
| Type 357 |
| Cas1 |
|
| Type 381 |
| Cas1 |
|
| Type 427 |
| Cas1 |
|
| Type 458 |
| Eai | |
| Type 1093 |
| Cas |
|
aClades were defined according to the definitions in spolDB3.0 (); INSERT PICT = no hybridization, INSERT PICT = positive hybridization. CAS1 (Central Asian 1) family (also termed as the "Delhi type") is characterized by INSERT PICT 4–7 and INSERT PICT 23–34; Manu (derived from the name of a Hindu mythological figure supposed to be the world's first king and father of the human race) is characterized by INSERT PICT 33–34 (), and presumed to be the probable ancestor of both the CAS and EAI (East African Indian). Beijing family is characterized by INSERT PICT 1–34. Both EAI and CAS1 belong to the Major Genetic Group 1; H3 (Haarlem 3) belongs to the Major Genetic Group 2; and T1 and T2 are poorly defined families that belong to the Major Genetic Group 2 or 3 (). T1 and T2 need other markers for a better characterization (T1, INSERT PICT 33–36 and T2, INSERT PICT 33–36 and INSERT PICT 40 [6]).