Joseph I Friedman1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1230, New York, NY 10029, USA. jfriedman1@rcn.com
Abstract
RATIONALE: Alterations in the central cholinergic system of patients with schizophrenia such as reduced numbers of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in the cortex and hippocampus may contribute to the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia. Therefore, pharmacological treatments that enhance central cholinergic function may be useful as cognitive enhancers in schizophrenia. METHODS: Searches were conducted for articles which investigated alterations of central cholinergic systems in patients with schizophrenia. Additional searches were conducted for animal and human trials of potential cognitive enhancing compounds that target the cholinergic system and any preliminary trials conducted with schizophrenic patients. RESULTS: Currently available treatments which are potentially suitable for this purpose include acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists, nicotinic agonists, and allosteric potentiators of nicotinic receptor function. Although some open label studies demonstrate modest cognitive improvements of schizophrenic patients treated with donepezil, data from a blinded, placebo controlled study demonstrate no effect. Data from a controlled trial of galantamine, a combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and allosteric potentiator of the nicotinic receptor, indicates that this may be an effective alternative. In addition, some preclinical data indicates that selective M(1) muscarinic agonists under development may have potential as cognitive enhancers and antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenic patients. CONCLUSIONS: A cholinergic approach to ameliorating the cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia appears viable. There is some preliminary data to support the efficacy of combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and allosteric potentiators of the nicotinic receptor, whereas future trials are awaited for more specific muscarinic agonists currently under development.
RATIONALE: Alterations in the central cholinergic system of patients with schizophrenia such as reduced numbers of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in the cortex and hippocampus may contribute to the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia. Therefore, pharmacological treatments that enhance central cholinergic function may be useful as cognitive enhancers in schizophrenia. METHODS: Searches were conducted for articles which investigated alterations of central cholinergic systems in patients with schizophrenia. Additional searches were conducted for animal and human trials of potential cognitive enhancing compounds that target the cholinergic system and any preliminary trials conducted with schizophrenicpatients. RESULTS: Currently available treatments which are potentially suitable for this purpose include acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists, nicotinic agonists, and allosteric potentiators of nicotinic receptor function. Although some open label studies demonstrate modest cognitive improvements of schizophrenicpatients treated with donepezil, data from a blinded, placebo controlled study demonstrate no effect. Data from a controlled trial of galantamine, a combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and allosteric potentiator of the nicotinic receptor, indicates that this may be an effective alternative. In addition, some preclinical data indicates that selective M(1) muscarinic agonists under development may have potential as cognitive enhancers and antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenicpatients. CONCLUSIONS: A cholinergic approach to ameliorating the cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia appears viable. There is some preliminary data to support the efficacy of combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and allosteric potentiators of the nicotinic receptor, whereas future trials are awaited for more specific muscarinic agonists currently under development.
Authors: A Schotte; P F Janssen; W Gommeren; W H Luyten; P Van Gompel; A S Lesage; K De Loore; J E Leysen Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: C A Briggs; D J Anderson; J D Brioni; J J Buccafusco; M J Buckley; J E Campbell; M W Decker; D Donnelly-Roberts; R L Elliott; M Gopalakrishnan; M W Holladay; Y H Hui; W J Jackson; D J Kim; K C Marsh; A O'Neill; M A Prendergast; K B Ryther; J P Sullivan; S P Arneric Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 1997 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Ziad Nahas; Mark S George; Michael D Horner; John S Markowitz; Xingbao Li; Jeffrey P Lorberbaum; Susan D Owens; Susan McGurk; Lindsay DeVane; S Craig Risch Journal: Neurocase Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 0.881
Authors: Jelveh Lameh; Krista McFarland; Jorgen Ohlsson; Fredrik Ek; Fabrice Piu; Ethan S Burstein; Ali Tabatabaei; Roger Olsson; Stefania Risso Bradley; Douglas W Bonhaus Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Salma R I Ribeiz; Débora P Bassitt; Jony A Arrais; Renata Avila; David C Steffens; Cássio M C Bottino Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Gersilene Valente de Oliveira; Patrícia Xavier Lima Gomes; Fernanda Yvelize Ramos de Araújo; Silvânia Maria Mendes Vasconcelos; Hélio Vitoriano Nobre Júnior; Francisca Cléa Florenço de Sousa; David F de Lucena; Thomas N Hyphantis; André Férrer Carvalho; Danielle Silveira Macêdo Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: C J Langmead; N E Austin; C L Branch; J T Brown; K A Buchanan; C H Davies; I T Forbes; V A H Fry; J J Hagan; H J Herdon; G A Jones; R Jeggo; J N C Kew; A Mazzali; R Melarange; N Patel; J Pardoe; A D Randall; C Roberts; A Roopun; K R Starr; A Teriakidis; M D Wood; M Whittington; Z Wu; J Watson Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Morgane Thomsen; Jürgen Wess; Brian S Fulton; Anders Fink-Jensen; S Barak Caine Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 4.530