Literature DB >> 15204292

The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.

Gwanseob Shin1, Gary Mirka.   

Abstract

There are many work environments that require workers to perform manual materials handling tasks on ground surfaces that are not perfectly flat (e.g. in agriculture, construction, and maritime workplaces). These sloped ground surfaces may have an impact on the lifting strategy/technique employed by the lifter, which may, in turn, alter the biomechanical loading of the spine. Describing the changes in kinematics and kinetics of the torso is the first step in assessing the impact of these changes and is the focus of the current research. Subjects' whole-body motions were recorded as they lifted a 10 kg box while standing on two inclined surfaces (facing an upward slope: 10 degrees and 20 degrees), two declined surfaces (facing a downward slope: -10 degrees and -20 degrees), and a flat surface (0 degrees) using three lifting techniques (leg lift, back lift and freestyle lift). These data were then used in a two-dimensional, five-segment dynamic biomechanical model (top-down) to evaluate the effect of these slopes on the net moment about the L5/S1 joint. The results of this study showed an interesting interaction effect wherein the net L5/S1 moment was relatively insensitive to changes in slope angle under the back lift condition, but showed a significant effect during the leg lift and freestyle lifting conditions. The results show that under the freestyle lifting condition the peak L5/S1 moment was significantly higher for the inclined surfaces as compared to the flat surfaces (6.8% greater) or declined surfaces (10.0% greater). Subsequent component analysis revealed that both trunk flexion angle and angular trunk acceleration were driving this response. Collectively, the results of this study indicate that ground slope angle does influence the lifting kinematics and kinetics and therefore needs to be considered when evaluating risk of low back injury in these working conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204292     DOI: 10.1080/00140130310001653066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  The effect of an inclined landing surface on biomechanical variables during a jumping task.

Authors:  Marshall Hagins; Evangelos Pappas; Ian Kremenic; Karl F Orishimo; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Chien-Chi Chang; Ming-Lun Lu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Evaluation of postural sway and impact forces during ingress and egress of scissor lifts at elevations.

Authors:  Christopher S Pan; Sharon S Chiou; Tsui-Ying Kau; Bryan M Wimer; Xiaopeng Ning; Paul Keane
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Control of upright stance over inclined surfaces.

Authors:  Rinaldo André Mezzarane; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Postural Stability Margins as a Function of Support Surface Slopes.

Authors:  Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder; Seymon M Slobounov; John Henry Challis; Karl Maxim Newell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.