C Silva1, J C Maltez, E Trindade, A Arriaga, E Ducla-Soares. 1. Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, CSI-Center of Intelligent Systems, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8000-117 Faro, Portugal. cmsilva@ualg.pt
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this work we study the performance of minimum norm methods to estimate the localization of brain electrical activity. These methods are based on the simplest forms of L(1) and L(2) norm estimates and are applied to simulated EEG data. The influence of several factors like the number of electrodes, grid density, head model, the number and depth of the sources and noise levels was taken into account. The main objective of the study is to give information about the dependence, on these factors, of the localization sources, to allow for proper interpretation of the data obtained in real EEG records. METHODS: For the tests we used simulated dipoles and compared the localizations predicted by the L(1) and L(2) norms with the location of these point-like sources. We varied each parameter separately and evaluated the results. RESULTS: From this work we conclude that, the grid should be constructed with approximately 650 points, so that the information about the orientation of the sources is preserved, especially for L(2) norm estimates; in favorable noise conditions, both L(1) and L(2) norm approaches are able to distinguish between more than one point-like sources. CONCLUSIONS: The critical dependence of the results on the noise level and source depth indicates that regularized and weighted solutions should be used. Finally, all these results are valid both for spherical and for realistic head models.
OBJECTIVE: In this work we study the performance of minimum norm methods to estimate the localization of brain electrical activity. These methods are based on the simplest forms of L(1) and L(2) norm estimates and are applied to simulated EEG data. The influence of several factors like the number of electrodes, grid density, head model, the number and depth of the sources and noise levels was taken into account. The main objective of the study is to give information about the dependence, on these factors, of the localization sources, to allow for proper interpretation of the data obtained in real EEG records. METHODS: For the tests we used simulated dipoles and compared the localizations predicted by the L(1) and L(2) norms with the location of these point-like sources. We varied each parameter separately and evaluated the results. RESULTS: From this work we conclude that, the grid should be constructed with approximately 650 points, so that the information about the orientation of the sources is preserved, especially for L(2) norm estimates; in favorable noise conditions, both L(1) and L(2) norm approaches are able to distinguish between more than one point-like sources. CONCLUSIONS: The critical dependence of the results on the noise level and source depth indicates that regularized and weighted solutions should be used. Finally, all these results are valid both for spherical and for realistic head models.
Authors: Marcello Massimini; Fabio Ferrarelli; Steve K Esser; Brady A Riedner; Reto Huber; Michael Murphy; Michael J Peterson; Giulio Tononi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pedro A Valdés-Sosa; Mayrim Vega-Hernández; José Miguel Sánchez-Bornot; Eduardo Martínez-Montes; María Antonieta Bobes Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Jurriaan M Peters; Anna K Prohl; Shigetoshi Takaya; Joseph R Madsen; Blaise F Bourgeois; Barbara A Dworetzky; Matti S Hämäläinen; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Fugang Yang; Mehmet S Ozturk; Lingling Zhao; Wenxiang Cong; Ge Wang; Xavier Intes Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 4.538