Literature DB >> 15201668

Cytomegalovirus infection in organ-transplant recipients: diagnostic value of pp65 antigen test, qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative Taqman PCR.

Ursula Meyer-Koenig1, Manfred Weidmann, Günter Kirste, Frank T Hufert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. In this study, we compared the diagnostic value of pp65 antigen test, qualitative nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and quantitative Taqman PCR in predicting the clinical outcome of CMV infection.
METHODS: A total of 169 samples derived from 59 organ-transplant recipients (kidney n= 46, liver n= 11, kidney and pancreas n= 2) were analyzed. Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were isolated using dextran gradient centrifugation, and 2 x 10 cells were analyzed for pp65 antigen by immunofluorescence. A crude DNA extract obtained from the same number of cells was used for qualitative nested PCR and quantitative Taqman PCR analysis. RESULTS.: The correlation coefficient of pp65 antigen test and Taqman PCR was R= 0.699 (P = 0.001). With cut-off values for pp65 antigen test set at greater than 10 positive nuclei per 2 x 10 PBL, sensitivity was 91%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 70%. When the corresponding cut-off value for Taqman PCR was applied (>125000 genome copies per 2 x 10 PBL), a sensitivity of 83% and a PPV of 68% were found. Both assays allowed for the monitoring of successful antiviral therapy. Although qualitative nested PCR was highly sensitive (95%), it was less useful in predicting CMV disease (PPV 47%) and in therapy control.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that pp65 antigen test and Taqman PCR are almost equivalent in the monitoring of CMV infection and disease when identical cell numbers are used for both assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201668     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000133992.89191.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Errors in published sequences of human cytomegalovirus primers and probes: do we need more quality control?

Authors:  Wafa Habbal; Fawza Monem; Barbara Christine Gärtner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Diagnostic value of reverse transcription-PCR for detection of cytomegalovirus pp67 in samples from solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ursula Meyer-Koenig; Ilona Romberg; Kerstin Schneider; Manfred Weidmann; Winfried V Kern; Frank T Hufert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The role of the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay in the detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus syndrome and disease in solid organ transplant recipients: A review of the British Columbia experience.

Authors:  Erica D Greanya; Nilufar Partovi; Eric M Yoshida; R Jean Shapiro; Robert D Levy; Chris H Sherlock; Gwen M Stephens
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 4.  Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Raymund R Razonable; Randall T Hayden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Refractory pharyngeal ulceration due to cytomegalovirus in a patient with HIV infection: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Morichika Osa; Akihiro Sato; Maki Sakagami; Masaki Machida; Takao Sato; Ayaka Tsukimori; Shinji Fukushima; Itaru Nakamura; Ryo Akai; Kiyoaki Tsukahara; Hidehiro Watanabe
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.