Literature DB >> 15201051

Enzyme/non-enzyme discrimination and prediction of enzyme active site location using charge-based methods.

Paul Bate1, Jim Warwicker.   

Abstract

Calculations of charge interactions complement analysis of a characterised active site, rationalising pH-dependence of activity and transition state stabilisation. Prediction of active site location through large DeltapK(a)s or electrostatic strain is relevant for structural genomics. We report a study of ionisable groups in a set of 20 enzymes, finding that false positives obscure predictive potential. In a larger set of 156 enzymes, peaks in solvent-space electrostatic properties are calculated. Both electric field and potential match well to active site location. The best correlation is found with electrostatic potential calculated from uniform charge density over enzyme volume, rather than from assignment of a standard atom-specific charge set. Studying a shell around each molecule, for 77% of enzymes the potential peak is within that 5% of the shell closest to the active site centre, and 86% within 10%. Active site identification by largest cleft, also with projection onto a shell, gives 58% of enzymes for which the centre of the largest cleft lies within 5% of the active site, and 70% within 10%. Dielectric boundary conditions emphasise clefts in the uniform charge density method, which is suited to recognition of binding pockets embedded within larger clefts. The variation of peak potential with distance from active site, and comparison between enzyme and non-enzyme sets, gives an optimal threshold distinguishing enzyme from non-enzyme. We find that 87% of the enzyme set exceeds the threshold as compared to 29% of the non-enzyme set. Enzyme/non-enzyme homologues, "structural genomics" annotated proteins and catalytic/non-catalytic RNAs are studied in this context.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201051     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  24 in total

1.  Structure-based identification of catalytic residues.

Authors:  Ran Yahalom; Dan Reshef; Ayana Wiener; Sagiv Frankel; Nir Kalisman; Boaz Lerner; Chen Keasar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-04-12

2.  Enhanced performance in prediction of protein active sites with THEMATICS and support vector machines.

Authors:  Wenxu Tong; Ronald J Williams; Ying Wei; Leonel F Murga; Jaeju Ko; Mary Jo Ondrechen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Application of new multi-resolution methods for the comparison of biomolecular electrostatic properties in the absence of global structural similarity.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Chandrajit L Bajaj; Bongjune Kwon; Todd J Dolinsky; Jens E Nielsen; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; C Daniel Varnado; Christopher W Bielawski; Adam R Urbach; Lyle Isaacs; Matthew T Geballe; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure.

Authors:  John A Capra; Roman A Laskowski; Janet M Thornton; Mona Singh; Thomas A Funkhouser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Assessing the structural conservation of protein pockets to study functional and allosteric sites: implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  Alejandro Panjkovich; Xavier Daura
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-03-31

7.  Molecular surface mesh generation by filtering electron density map.

Authors:  Joachim Giard; Benoît Macq
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-12

8.  Evolutionary trace annotation of protein function in the structural proteome.

Authors:  Serkan Erdin; R Matthew Ward; Eric Venner; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  SitesIdentify: a protein functional site prediction tool.

Authors:  Tracey Bray; Pedro Chan; Salim Bougouffa; Richard Greaves; Andrew J Doig; Jim Warwicker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Active site prediction using evolutionary and structural information.

Authors:  Sriram Sankararaman; Fei Sha; Jack F Kirsch; Michael I Jordan; Kimmen Sjölander
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.