Literature DB >> 15200748

A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC).

P Stübner1, R Zieglmayer, F Horak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) is an established method for the controlled exposure of patients to specific allergens, used to make valid comparisons between antihistamines. The aim of the significantly more than loratadine at all time two placebo-controlled, randomised studies reported here was to compare the efficacy and safety of levocetirizine 5 mg od and loratadine 10 mg od in subjects suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During each study period, SAR and PAR subjects were exposed to grass pollen or house-dust mite allergens, respectively for 6 h on 2 consecutive days in the VCC. Each day, medications were administered 2 h after the start of the challenge; with a washout of at least 5 days between each period. The main criterion for evaluation of efficacy was the major symptom complex (MSC) for SAR and the complex symptom score (CSS) for PAR.
RESULTS: The pattern of patients' response was similar in SAR and PAR. Both levocetirizine and loratadine were superior to placebo in alleviating SAR and PAR symptoms at all time intervals evaluated during the two study days. Levocetirizine decreased the mean MSC score intervals in SAR subjects, with the most marked difference observed on day 2 (p = 0.002). In PAR patients, although with borderline significance (p = 0.08), levocetirizine decreased the mean CSS more than loratadine. Levocetirizine appeared to have a faster onset of action than loratadine in SAR (45 min versus 1 h 15 min) and PAR (1 h versus 1 h 30 min). However, these apparent differences were not tested for statistical significance. Both medications were well tolerated and no treatment-related adverse events were reported. This level of antihistamine efficacy was maintained regardless of whether the subjects' rhinitis was seasonal or perennial.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that levocetirizine is superior to loratadine in improving symptoms in SAR and that there is a similar trend in PAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15200748     DOI: 10.1185/030079904125003700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  12 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.

Authors:  William E Berger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Levocetirizine has a longer duration of action on improving total nasal symptoms score than fexofenadine after single administration.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak; Petra U Zieglmayer; R Zieglmayer; A Kavina; P Lemell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Patients' perception of the value of levocetirizine in allergic diseases : a multicentre observational study in Germany.

Authors:  L Klimek; H Wrede; B C Schott; I Hansen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Sedative Effects of Levocetirizine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Kornkiat Snidvongs; Kachorn Seresirikachorn; Likhit Khattiyawittayakun; Wirach Chitsuthipakorn
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities and Their Unique Contributions to Allergic Rhinitis Research.

Authors:  Michelle L North; Mena Soliman; Terry Walker; Lisa M Steacy; Anne K Ellis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Levocetirizine: a review of its use in the management of allergic rhinitis and skin allergies.

Authors:  Philip I Hair; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The effects of bilastine compared with cetirizine, fexofenadine, and placebo on allergen-induced nasal and ocular symptoms in patients exposed to aeroallergen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak; Petra Zieglmayer; René Zieglmayer; Patrick Lemell
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.

Authors:  Philippe Devillier; Nicolas Roche; Christophe Faisy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Bilastine: new insight into antihistamine treatment.

Authors:  Erminia Ridolo; Marcello Montagni; Laura Bonzano; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Giorgio Walter Canonica
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2015-04-15

10.  Management of persistent allergic rhinitis: evidence-based treatment with levocetirizine.

Authors:  Joaquim Mullol; Claus Bachert; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.