Literature DB >> 15200631

Suppressing where but not what: the effect of saccades on dorsal- and ventral-stream visual processing.

David E Irwin1, James R Brockmole.   

Abstract

Some cognitive processes are suppressed during saccadic eye movements, whereas others are not. In two experiments, we investigated the locus of this interference effect. In one experiment, subjects decided whether pictured items were objects or nonobjects while making saccades of different lengths. Saccade distance had no effect on response time, indicating that saccades do not interfere with object recognition. However, in a second experiment, in which subjects decided whether pictured items faced to the left or to the right, response time increased with saccade distance, indicating that processing was suppressed during the saccade. These results (along with others) suggest that dorsal-stream (where) processes are suppressed during saccades, whereas ventral-stream (what) processes are not. Because the dorsal stream is instrumental in generating saccades, we propose that cognitive saccadic suppression results from dual-task interference within this visual subsystem.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15200631     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00703.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

1.  Decision-related perturbations of decision-irrelevant eye movements.

Authors:  Sung Jun Joo; Leor N Katz; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  When less is more: how infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support.

Authors:  Marianella Casasola
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  fMRI environment can impair memory performance in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Denise C Park
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Transsaccadic representation of layout: what is the time course of boundary extension?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Ventral and dorsal visual stream contributions to the perception of object shape and object location.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Roberta Klatzky; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Lexical processing during saccades in text comprehension.

Authors:  Kiyomi Yatabe; Martin J Pickering; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

8.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Both lexical and non-lexical characters are processed during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Hong-Mei Yan; Keith M Kendrick; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; David Alais; Casper J Erkelens; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.