Pim Cuijpers1, Heleen Riper, Lex Lemmers. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. P.Cuijpers@psy.vu.nl
Abstract
AIMS: Brief interventions for problem drinking may result in decreased mortality rates. Long-term follow-up studies of brief interventions do not produce a clear answer to the question as to whether these interventions reduce mortality or not. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing brief interventions with a control group, using the fixed-effects model. A systematic literature search produced four studies in which the mortality status of subjects was verified at follow-up. Six more studies reported some deaths at follow-up but did not verify mortality in death registers, and 22 further studies did not report the mortality status of the included subjects. FINDINGS: The pooled relative risk (RR) of dying was 0.47 for the four studies with verified mortality rates (95% CI: 0.25, 0.89). The pooled RR of all 32 studies was comparable (RR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.84), as were the RRs of several other subsamples of studies. The prevented fraction was 0.33 in the studies with verified mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall death rate was low in the population of problem drinkers, brief interventions do appear to reduce mortality.
AIMS: Brief interventions for problem drinking may result in decreased mortality rates. Long-term follow-up studies of brief interventions do not produce a clear answer to the question as to whether these interventions reduce mortality or not. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing brief interventions with a control group, using the fixed-effects model. A systematic literature search produced four studies in which the mortality status of subjects was verified at follow-up. Six more studies reported some deaths at follow-up but did not verify mortality in death registers, and 22 further studies did not report the mortality status of the included subjects. FINDINGS: The pooled relative risk (RR) of dying was 0.47 for the four studies with verified mortality rates (95% CI: 0.25, 0.89). The pooled RR of all 32 studies was comparable (RR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.84), as were the RRs of several other subsamples of studies. The prevented fraction was 0.33 in the studies with verified mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall death rate was low in the population of problem drinkers, brief interventions do appear to reduce mortality.
Authors: Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Thomas R Peterson; Arturo Gonzales; Ana Moseley; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-04-09 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jan Gryczynski; Sharon M Kelly; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arethusa Kirk; Kevin E O'Grady; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Heleen Riper; Jeannet Kramer; Max Keuken; Filip Smit; Gerard Schippers; Pim Cuijpers Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428