Literature DB >> 1520018

Optimum method for administration of biosynthetic human growth hormone: a randomised crossover trial of an Auto Injector and a pen injection system.

R Stanhope1, A Albanese, L Moyle, G Hamill.   

Abstract

The use of optimum conventional growth hormone administration, using a growth hormone vial combined with an Auto Injector, was compared with a pen injection system using a cartridge of growth hormone. In both methods of administration the concentration of growth hormone was 16 IU/ml. Thirty patients (22 boys, eight girls) who had all previously been treated with growth hormone (4 IU/ml) administered using needles and syringes (without an Auto Injector) were randomised into receiving one of either treatment for three months and then crossed over for a further three months. Fourteen patients (10 boys, four girls) initially received KabiVial 16 IU/ml combined with an Auto Injector while 16 patients (12 boys, four girls) were treated with KabiPen 16 IU/ml. Mean age in both groups was 9.6 years. The majority of patients in both groups were treated with a regimen of either 15 or 20 units/m2/week as a daily subcutaneous injection. Of the 30 patients who started in this trial, two who commenced using an Auto Injector refused to change to a pen system and were excluded from further analysis. When scored on a scale of -5 to +5 general convenience when changing from an Auto Injector to the KabiPen decreased from +4.7 to +1.0. When assessed for pain, the Auto Injector group scored +4.7, which decreased to -0.2 (more painful) for the pen. At the end of the trial 23 patients (82%) chose to continue with the KabiVial/Auto Injector combination as they found this less painful and the child did not see the needle or need to insert the needle manually. Five patients (18%) continued with the KabiPen as they considered the device smaller and easier to use. The accuracy of dosing using KabiVial was 100% compared with the range of 88% to 111% using KabiPen as the latter was available only in 0.5 unit increments. No growth hormone was wasted using KabiVial, although a mean of 0.6 units was wasted with every 16 IU cartridge in the KabiPen system. It is concluded that patients should be able to contribute to the choice of growth hormone delivery systems and that newer methods need careful assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1520018      PMCID: PMC1793589          DOI: 10.1136/adc.67.8.994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for epilepsy.

Authors:  C E Polkey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Evaluation of a pen injector system for growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  G Hamill; R Stanhope
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Evaluation of a pen injector system for growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  P D Gluckman; W S Cutfield
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Contribution of dose and frequency of administration to the therapeutic effect of growth hormone.

Authors:  P J Smith; P C Hindmarsh; C G Brook
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Frequency of administration of growth hormone--an important factor in determining growth response to exogenous growth hormone.

Authors:  P C Hindmarsh; R Stanhope; M A Preece; C G Brook
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1990

Review 6.  Clinical approach to the management of intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  J Aicardi
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Simplified growth hormone therapy--first clinical experience with the KabiPen.

Authors:  K Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1988

8.  Growth hormone administration by means of an injection pen.

Authors:  J O Jørgensen; J Møller; F S Jensen; J T Jørgensen; J S Christiansen
Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1989-08
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Optimum method for growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  R N Wild
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Optimum method for growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  S L Smith; P C Hindmarsh; C G Brook
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Patient knowledge and compliance with growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  R Stanhope; L Moyle; M MacSwiney
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Growth hormone treatment without a needle using the Preci-Jet 50 transjector.

Authors:  P Bareille; M MacSwiney; A Albanese; C De Vile; R Stanhope
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Patient Acceptance, Ease of Use, and Preference for Norditropin NordiFlex with NordiFlex PenMate: Results from an Open-Label, User Survey of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Anita Hokken-Koelega; Alexandra Keller; Viatcheslav Rakov; Stefan Kipper; Jovanna Dahlgren
Journal:  ISRN Endocrinol       Date:  2011-09-20

6.  Understanding and meeting the needs of those using growth hormone injection devices.

Authors:  Hervé Dumas; Paris Panayiotopoulos; Dorothy Parker; Vincent Pongpairochana
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.763

7.  Patients' Perception of the Use of the EasyPod™ Growth Hormone Injector Device and Impact on Injection Adherence: A Multi-Center Regional Study.

Authors:  Asma Deeb; Saif Al Yaarubi; Bassam Bin Abbas; Jamal Al Jubeh; Deepti Chaturvedi; Noura Al Hassani; Angham Mutair; Neamat Al Masri; Yazan Al Sanad; Azza Al Shidhani; Noha Samir Mahmoud; Abdullah Alherbish; Martin O Savage
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.