Literature DB >> 15198350

Improving patient safety by repeating (read-back) telephone reports of critical information.

Joan Barenfanger1, Robert L Sautter, Diane L Lang, Susan M Collins, Donna M Hacek, Lance R Peterson.   

Abstract

Reducing the rate of avoidable errors is crucial to patient safety. Telephone calls with misunderstood critical results constitute one area in which opportunities for improvement exist. The aviation industry has dealt with this issue by requiring pilots to repeat instructions received from the air traffic controller. At 3 health care organizations, we tested a program to decrease telephone reporting errors by requiring the recipients of critical results to repeat the message. Of 822 outgoing telephone calls from the laboratory, 29 errors were detected (error rate 3.5%). Calls to physicians had the highest rate of errors (6/95 [5%]). The time required to ask for the information and for the message to be repeated averaged 12.8 seconds per call, which corrected 29 errors. A simple system of repeating telephoned laboratory results has the potential to reduce the risk of medical errors and improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15198350     DOI: 10.1309/9DYM-6R0T-M830-U95Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  22 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of automated notification and customer service call centers for timely and accurate reporting of critical values: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward B Liebow; James H Derzon; John Fontanesi; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; Colleen Shaw; Pamela Thompson; Diana Mass; Robert Christenson; Paul Epner; Susan R Snyder
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis.

Authors:  V Arora; J Johnson; D Lovinger; H J Humphrey; D O Meltzer
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Laboratory results that should be ignored.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-10-11

4.  Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Aanand Dinkar Naik; Raghuram Rao; Laura Ann Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The value of outcomes data in the practice of clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Gary V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.

Authors:  Craig Campbell; Grahame Caldwell; Penelope Coates; Robert Flatman; Andrew Georgiou; Andrea Rita Horvath; Que Lam; Hans Schneider
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  Pathology consultation on reporting of critical values.

Authors:  Jonathan R Genzen; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Preventing communication errors in telephone medicine.

Authors:  Anna B Reisman; Karen E Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Handoff practices in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Beth W Liston; Kimberly M Tartaglia; Daniel Evans; Curt Walker; Dario Torre
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Nurse-physician communication in the long-term care setting: perceived barriers and impact on patient safety.

Authors:  Jennifer Tjia; Kathleen M Mazor; Terry Field; Vanessa Meterko; Ann Spenard; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.