Literature DB >> 15197192

Phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin versus epirubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403).

Bent Ejlertsen1, Henning T Mouridsen, Sven T Langkjer, Jorn Andersen, Johanna Sjöström, Mogens Kjaer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1000 mg/m(2) (950 mg/m(2) from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses.
RESULTS: Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P =.15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P =.048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P =.019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P =.50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms.
CONCLUSION: Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197192     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer - An Anachronism in the Era of Personalised and Targeted Oncological Therapy?

Authors:  A Schneeweiss; E Ruckhäberle; J Huober
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study.

Authors:  Patrizia Vici; Giuseppe Colucci; Francesco Giotta; Domenico Sergi; Gianfranco Filippelli; Pasquale Perri; Claudio Botti; Enrico Vizza; Armando Carpino; Laura Pizzuti; Agnese Latorre; Diana Giannarelli; Massimo Lopez; Luigi Di Lauro
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-12

4.  Comparison of CVF (Cyclophosphamide+Vinorelbine+5-Fluorouracil) and CMF (Cyclophosphamide+Methotrexate+5-Fluorouracil) Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Geumhee Gwak; Kyeongmee Park; Eunah Shin; Sehwan Han; Ji-Young Kim; Hongyong Kim; Young Duk Kim; Hong Ju Kim; Ki Whan Kim; Byung Noe Bae; Keun Ho Yang; Hyunjin Cho; Sung-Jin Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Vinorelbine alternating oral and intravenous plus epirubicin in first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase II study.

Authors:  D Serin; M Verrill; A Jones; T Delozier; R Coleman; E-D Kreuser; K Mross; B Longerey; M Brandely
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Predicting efficacy of epirubicin by a multigene assay in advanced breast cancer within a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort: a retrospective-prospective blinded study.

Authors:  Anna Sofie Kappel Buhl; Troels Dreier Christensen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Knud Mejer Nelausen; Eva Balslev; Ann Søegaard Knoop; Eva Harder Brix; Else Svensson; Vesna Glavicic; Adam Luczak; Sven Tyge Langkjer; Søren Linnet; Erik Hugger Jakobsen; Jurij Bogovic; Bent Ejlertsen; Annie Rasmussen; Anker Hansen; Steen Knudsen; Dorte Nielsen; Peter Buhl Jensen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Can contemporary trials of chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer detect overall survival benefit?

Authors:  Sherko Kümmel; Christian Jackisch; Volkmar Müller; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sandra Klawitter; Michael P Lux
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 8.  International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Philippe L Bedard; Eric P Winer; Olivia Pagani; Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka; Lesley J Fallowfield; Stella Kyriakides; Alberto Costa; Tanja Cufer; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sue Carrick; Sharon Parker; Charlene E Thornton; Davina Ghersi; John Simes; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

Review 10.  A Review of Systemic Treatment in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Simon B Zeichner; Hiromi Terawaki; Keerthi Gogineni
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.