HYPOTHESIS: En bloc esophagectomy (EBE) provides improved survival over transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in patients with similarly sized transmural tumors (T3) and lymph node metastases (N1). DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study of 2 methods of esophageal resection for cancer. SETTING: University hospital (tertiary referral center for esophageal disease). PATIENTS: There were 49 patients (27 who underwent EBE and 22 who underwent THE) with similar T3 N1 disease and the following matched criteria: tumors of similar size and location, more than 20 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen, R0 resection, no previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and follow-up until death or for a minimum of 5 years. Main Outcome Measure Survival adjusted for differences in demographic and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The number of nodes harvested was greatest after EBE vs THE (median, 52 vs 29 [range, 21-85 vs 20-60]; P<.001). The median number of involved nodes was similar after EBE vs THE (median, 5 vs 7 [range, 1-19 vs 1-16]). The only 2 independent factors that affected survival in a Cox analysis were the number of involved lymph nodes (P =.01) and the type of resection (P =.03). Patients who underwent EBE had a survival benefit over those who underwent THE (P =.01). The survival benefit of EBE was seen only in patients with fewer than 9 involved lymph nodes (P<.001). CONCLUSION: En bloc esophagectomy confers a better survival than THE in patients with T3 N1 disease and fewer than 9 lymph node metastases.
HYPOTHESIS: En bloc esophagectomy (EBE) provides improved survival over transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in patients with similarly sized transmural tumors (T3) and lymph node metastases (N1). DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study of 2 methods of esophageal resection for cancer. SETTING: University hospital (tertiary referral center for esophageal disease). PATIENTS: There were 49 patients (27 who underwent EBE and 22 who underwent THE) with similar T3 N1 disease and the following matched criteria: tumors of similar size and location, more than 20 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen, R0 resection, no previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and follow-up until death or for a minimum of 5 years. Main Outcome Measure Survival adjusted for differences in demographic and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The number of nodes harvested was greatest after EBE vs THE (median, 52 vs 29 [range, 21-85 vs 20-60]; P<.001). The median number of involved nodes was similar after EBE vs THE (median, 5 vs 7 [range, 1-19 vs 1-16]). The only 2 independent factors that affected survival in a Cox analysis were the number of involved lymph nodes (P =.01) and the type of resection (P =.03). Patients who underwent EBE had a survival benefit over those who underwent THE (P =.01). The survival benefit of EBE was seen only in patients with fewer than 9 involved lymph nodes (P<.001). CONCLUSION: En bloc esophagectomy confers a better survival than THE in patients with T3 N1 disease and fewer than 9 lymph node metastases.
Authors: Michael Parker; Steven P Bowers; Ross F Goldberg; Jason M Pfluke; John A Stauffer; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jan Johansson; Pauline Djerf; Stefan Oberg; Thomas Zilling; Christer Staël von Holstein; Folke Johnsson; Bruno Walther Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Chin-Ann J Ong; Joel Shapiro; Katie S Nason; Jon M Davison; Xinxue Liu; Caryn Ross-Innes; Maria O'Donovan; Winand N M Dinjens; Katharina Biermann; Nicholas Shannon; Susannah Worster; Laura K E Schulz; James D Luketich; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 44.544