Literature DB >> 15194094

All-poly tibial component better than metal-backed: a randomized RSA study.

B Norgren1, T Dalén, K G Nilsson.   

Abstract

The quality of the fixation of the tibial component in 21 patients (23 knees) undergoing a cemented total-knee arthroplasty of the Profix design was investigated using radiostereometric analysis during 24 months. The patients were randomized to either an all-polyethylene (AP) or a metal-backed (MB) tibial component. The articulating geometry and the stem design of the implants were identical, as were the operative technique and the postoperative regimen. The results showed no negative consequences as regards fixation using AP tibial components. In all aspects, the AP components displayed magnitudes of migration on par with, or sometimes even lower than their MB counterparts. Five of 11 MB components displayed continuous migration between 1 and 2 years, compared to none of the AP implants, a finding known to be of positive prognostic significance when predicting future aseptic loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194094     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Klaas Auke Nouta; Wiebe C Verra; Bart G Pijls; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals.

Authors:  Massimo Innocenti; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Anna Maria Carossino; Maria Luisa Brandi; Roberto Civinini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Valerio D'Andrea; Nicholas Mannering; Joel Locher; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Survivorship comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty--Chinese experience.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Pengde Kang; Liao Wang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Klaas-Auke Nouta; Josepha Wm Plevier; Marta Fiocco; Saskia Middeldorp; Rob Ghh Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Celecoxib does not appear to affect prosthesis fixation in total knee replacement: A randomized study using radiostereometry in 50 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Meunier; Per Aspenberg; Lars Good
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Monoblock all-polyethylene tibial components have a lower risk of early revision than metal-backed modular components.

Authors:  Vivek Mohan; Maria C S Inacio; Robert S Namba; Dhiren Sheth; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.