Literature DB >> 15194020

Effect of optimizing the VV interval on left ventricular contractility in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Berry M van Gelder1, Frank A Bracke, Albert Meijer, Lex J M Lakerveld, Nico H J Pijls.   

Abstract

Simultaneous biventricular pacing improves left ventricular (LV) function in patients with heart failure and LV asynchrony. Proper timing of the interventricular pacing interval (VV interval) may further optimize LV function. We investigated the acute hemodynamic response of changing the VV interval using maximum LV dP/dt (LV dP/dt(max)) as a parameter for LV function. A biventricular pacemaker was implanted in 53 patients with severely impaired LV function, New York Heart Association class III and IV heart failure, left bundle branch block, LV asynchrony, and a QRS interval >150 ms. Optimization of the atrioventricular and VV intervals was based on measurement of LV dP/dt(max) by a 0.014-in sensor-tipped pressure guidewire. Measurement of LV dP/dt(max) was obtained without complications in all patients. In patients in sinus rhythm with ischemic cardiomyopathy or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, mean improvements by simultaneous biventricular pacing were 17% and 18%, respectively. Patients in atrial fibrillation showed an improvement of 21%. Optimizing the VV interval resulted in further absolute increases of 8%, 7%, and 3%, respectively, in dP/dt(max) in the 3 groups. Maximum dP/dt was achieved with LV pacing first in 44 patients, simultaneous right and left ventricular pacing in 6 patients, and right ventricular pacing first in 3 patients. The mean optimal VV intervals were 37 +/- 32 ms in the atrial fibrillation group, 28 +/- 30 ms in the idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy group, and 52 +/- 31 ms in the ischemic cardiomyopathy group. Optimization of the VV interval significantly increased LV dP/dt(max) compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, and such optimization could be easily, accurately, and reliably evaluated by a 0.014-in sensor-tipped pressure guidewire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194020     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  41 in total

1.  Use of a comprehensive numerical model to improve biventricular pacemaker temporization in patients affected by heart failure undergoing to CRT-D therapy.

Authors:  A Di Molfetta; L Santini; G B Forleo; M Cesario; C Tota; M Sgueglia; D Sergi; G Ferrari; F Romeo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  QRS Width as a Predictor of Right Ventricular Remodeling After Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation.

Authors:  C Paech; I Dähnert; F T Riede; R Wagner; T Kister; K Nieschke; F Wagner; R A Gebauer
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MGH experience.

Authors:  Jagmeet P Singh; Jeremy N Ruskin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  [Improved identification of suitable patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy by transthoracic echocardiography].

Authors:  O-A Breithardt; A M Sinha
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  [Modern pacing therapy].

Authors:  N Klein; M Klein; A Salameh; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Haemodynamic effects of changes in atrioventricular and interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy show a consistent pattern: analysis of shape, magnitude and relative importance of atrioventricular and interventricular delay.

Authors:  Z I Whinnett; J E R Davies; K Willson; C H Manisty; A W Chow; R A Foale; D Wyn Davies; A D Hughes; J Mayet; D P Francis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  The interaction of interventricular pacing intervals and left ventricular lead position during temporary biventricular pacing evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging.

Authors:  R E Lane; A W C Chow; J Mayet; D P Francis; N S Peters; R J Schilling; D W Davies
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Optimal use of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Cheuk-Man Yu; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Johan de Sutter; Nico Van de Veire; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  [Optimized programming during cardiac resynchronization therapy].

Authors:  T Deneke; B Lemke; M Horlitz; A Drüke; A Mügge; P H Grewe; T Lawo
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

10.  Visual LV motion and invasive LVdP/dtmax for selection and optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  A H M Jansen; B M van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.