Literature DB >> 15193180

[Efficacy and safety of a vaccine against human leptospirosis in Cuba].

Raydel Martínez1, Alberto Pérez, María del C Quiñones, Raúl Cruz, Angel Alvarez, Marlén Armesto, Carmen Fernández, Jorge Menéndez, Islay Rodríguez, Morelia Baró, Manuel Díaz, José Rodríguez, Gustavo Sierra, Ana Margarita Obregón, María Eugenia Toledo, Norma Fernández.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of vax-SPIRAL, a Cuban vaccine against leptospirosis, and to provide additional information concerning the safety of this vaccine (which was developed by Cuba's Finlay Institute).
METHODS: This phase III efficacy trial of vax-SPIRAL was controlled, randomized, and double blind. The control vaccine used for the trial was Heberbiovac-HB (Heber Biotec, Cuba), a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. The randomization unit for allocating persons to the study group or the control group were 523 family physician offices in the selected municipalities. The study covered the entire population of males and females from 20 to 64 years old who voluntarily agreed to participate, from the municipalities of Ranchuelo, Quemado, Santo Domingo, Encrucijada, Corralillo, Cifuentes, and Camajuaní, which are in the province of Villa Clara, in the central region of Cuba. The vaccinations were given in the physicians' offices between February and July 1998, with an interval of 6 weeks between the two doses. The follow-up period was 12 months. A case was considered positive if a person who had received the two doses of the vaccine became ill with leptospirosis more than 21 days after receiving the second dose, with the diagnosis confirmed through serological and microbiological methods. We calculated the efficacy of the vaccine and the relative risk of becoming ill with leptospirosis after the vaccination. For the safety study, two persons were chosen at random from among the individuals vaccinated at the office of each physician participating in the study. Follow-up of local and systemic adverse reactions was carried out by the family physicians during the seven days after the application of each dose. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 101 832 persons were vaccinated, with 50 354 of them (49.4%) receiving the leptospirosis vaccine and 51 478 of them (50.6%) receiving the control vaccine. The efficacy of the vax-SPIRAL vaccine was 78.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.2% to 88.3%), and the relative risk of becoming ill with leptospirosis after receiving the leptospirosis vaccine was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.41). General discomfort was the most frequent systemic adverse reaction, and mild spontaneous pain at the injection site was the most frequent local effect. The local and systemic adverse reactions were both more frequent in the study group than in the control group (P = 0.003). There were no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION: The vax-SPIRAL vaccine proved to be safe and efficacious for leptospirosis control. The vaccine is recommended for use in preventing this disease among groups at risk of contracting it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193180     DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000400005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica        ISSN: 1020-4989


  20 in total

Review 1.  Whole-cell inactivated leptospirosis vaccine: future prospects.

Authors:  Ramesh Verma; Pardeep Khanna; Suraj Chawla
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Human leptospirosis vaccines in China.

Authors:  Yinghua Xu; Qiang Ye
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Leptospirosis in humans.

Authors:  David A Haake; Paul N Levett
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 4.  Leptospirosis in pregnancy.

Authors:  G Puliyath; S Singh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Development of Human Recombinant Leptospirosis Vaccines.

Authors:  Natasha Rodrigues de Oliveira; Thaís Larré Oliveira; Sérgio Jorge; Odir Antônio Dellagostin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Using discrete choice modeling to evaluate the preferences and willingness to pay for leptospirosis vaccine.

Authors:  Joseph Arbiol; Mitsuyasu Yabe; Hisako Nomura; Maridel Borja; Nina Gloriani; Shin-ichi Yoshida
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Leptospirosis: The "mysterious" mimic.

Authors:  Ricardo Izurieta; Sagar Galwankar; Angela Clem
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2008-01

8.  Comparative genomic analysis of Chinese human leptospirosis vaccine strain and circulating isolate.

Authors:  Ruipeng Zhang; Wenkai Zhou; Qiang Ye; Sichao Song; Yuezhu Wang; Yinghua Xu; Lingbing Zeng
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Evaluation of immunoprotective activity of six leptospiral proteins in the hamster model of leptospirosis.

Authors:  Marina V Atzingen; Mônica L Vieira; Rosane Oliveira; Renan F Domingos; Renata S Mendes; Aline T Barros; Amane P Gonçales; Zenaide M de Morais; Silvio A Vasconcellos; Ana Lto Nascimento
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2012-10-19

10.  Characterization of the ompL1 gene of pathogenic Leptospira species in China and cross-immunogenicity of the OmpL1 protein.

Authors:  Haiyan Dong; Ye Hu; Feng Xue; Dexter Sun; David M Ojcius; Yafei Mao; Jie Yan
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.