Literature DB >> 15192143

Formation of a central supramolecular activation cluster is not required for activation of naive CD8+ T cells.

James P O'Keefe1, Kelly Blaine, Maria-Luisa Alegre, Thomas F Gajewski.   

Abstract

Although both naive and effector T lymphocytes interact with antigen-expressing cells, the functional outcome of these interactions is distinct. Naive CD8(+) T cells are activated to proliferate and differentiate into effector cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL), whereas CTL interact with specific targets, such as tumor cells, to induce apoptotic death. We recently observed that several molecules linked to actin cytoskeleton dynamics were up-regulated in effector vs. naive CD8(+) T cells, leading us to investigate whether T cell differentiation is accompanied by changes in actin-dependent processes. We observed that both naive and effector CD8(+) T cells underwent T cell receptor capping and formed stable conjugates with antigen-specific antigen-presenting cells. However, the characteristics of the immunological synapse were distinct. Whereas accumulation of signaling molecules at the T cell/antigen-presenting cell contact site was detectable in both naive and effector CD8(+) T cells, only effector cells developed a central supramolecular activation cluster as defined by punctate focusing of PKC theta, phospho-PKC theta, and phospho-ZAP70. Extended kinetics, CD28 costimulation, and high-affinity antigenic peptide did not promote PKC theta focusing in naive cells. Nonetheless, naive CD8(+) T cells polarized the microtubule organizing center, produced IL-2, proliferated, and differentiated into effector cells. Our results suggest that the formation of a central supramolecular activation cluster is not required for activation of naive CD8(+) T cells and support the notion that one role of an organized immune synapse is directed delivery of effector function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15192143      PMCID: PMC438980          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0305965101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation.

Authors:  A Grakoui; S K Bromley; C Sumen; M M Davis; A S Shaw; P M Allen; M L Dustin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Actin cytoskeleton regulates calcium dynamics and NFAT nuclear duration.

Authors:  Fabiola V Rivas; James P O'Keefe; Maria-Luisa Alegre; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells.

Authors:  C R Monks; B A Freiberg; H Kupfer; N Sciaky; A Kupfer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A receptor/cytoskeletal movement triggered by costimulation during T cell activation.

Authors:  C Wülfing; M M Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  TCR, LFA-1, and CD28 play unique and complementary roles in signaling T cell cytoskeletal reorganization.

Authors:  C E Sedwick; M M Morgan; L Jusino; J L Cannon; J Miller; J K Burkhardt
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Increased threshold for TCR-mediated signaling controls self reactivity of intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Authors:  S R Guehler; R J Finch; J A Bluestone; T A Barrett
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  High-affinity reactions between antigen-specific T-cell receptors and peptides associated with allogeneic and syngeneic major histocompatibility complex class I proteins.

Authors:  Y Sykulev; A Brunmark; T J Tsomides; S Kageyama; M Jackson; P A Peterson; H N Eisen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  B7.1 is a quantitatively stronger costimulus than B7.2 in the activation of naive CD8+ TCR-transgenic T cells.

Authors:  P E Fields; R J Finch; G S Gray; R Zollner; J L Thomas; K Sturmhoefel; K Lee; S Wolf; T F Gajewski; F W Fitch
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  T lymphocyte costimulation mediated by reorganization of membrane microdomains.

Authors:  A Viola; S Schroeder; Y Sakakibara; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted presentation of an internally synthesized antigen displays cell-type variability and segregates from the exogenous class II and endogenous class I presentation pathways.

Authors:  G E Loss; C G Elias; P E Fields; R K Ribaudo; M McKisic; A J Sant
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Diversity in immunological synapse structure.

Authors:  Timothy J Thauland; David C Parker
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  CD4 and CD8 T cells require different membrane gangliosides for activation.

Authors:  Masakazu Nagafuku; Kaori Okuyama; Yuri Onimaru; Akemi Suzuki; Yuta Odagiri; Tadashi Yamashita; Katsunori Iwasaki; Michihiro Fujiwara; Motoaki Takayanagi; Isao Ohno; Jin-ichi Inokuchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ligation of the cell surface receptor, CD46, alters T cell polarity and response to antigen presentation.

Authors:  Jane Oliaro; Anupama Pasam; Nigel J Waterhouse; Kylie A Browne; Mandy J Ludford-Menting; Joseph A Trapani; Sarah M Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A 20-amino acid module of protein kinase C{epsilon} involved in translocation and selective targeting at cell-cell contacts.

Authors:  Barthélémy Diouf; Alejandra Collazos; Gilles Labesse; Françoise Macari; Armelle Choquet; Philippe Clair; Cécile Gauthier-Rouvière; Nathalie C Guérineau; Philippe Jay; Frédéric Hollande; Dominique Joubert
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  T-cell antagonism by short half-life pMHC ligands can be mediated by an efficient trapping of T-cell polarization toward the APC.

Authors:  Leandro J Carreño; Erick M Riquelme; Pablo A González; Nicolas Espagnolle; Claudia A Riedel; Salvatore Valitutti; Alexis M Kalergis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  High-resolution, noninvasive longitudinal live imaging of immune responses.

Authors:  Midhat H Abdulreda; Gaetano Faleo; Ruth Damaris Molano; Maite Lopez-Cabezas; Judith Molina; Yaohong Tan; Oscar A Ron Echeverria; Elsie Zahr-Akrawi; Rayner Rodriguez-Diaz; Patrick K Edlund; Ingo Leibiger; Allison L Bayer; Victor Perez; Camillo Ricordi; Alejandro Caicedo; Antonello Pileggi; Per-Olof Berggren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  In vitro tracking and intracellular protein distribution in immunology.

Authors:  Kajal Zibaei; Sarah M Russell
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 8.  Origins of the cytolytic synapse.

Authors:  Maike de la Roche; Yukako Asano; Gillian M Griffiths
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 53.106

9.  Immunological synapse arrays: patterned protein surfaces that modulate immunological synapse structure formation in T cells.

Authors:  Junsang Doh; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  In and out of the bull's eye: protein kinase Cs in the immunological synapse.

Authors:  Kok-Fai Kong; Amnon Altman
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 16.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.