Literature DB >> 15190555

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.

Thomas P Sculco1.   

Abstract

Hip arthroplasty can be performed through less invasive exposures and achieve excellent results. The modification of the posterolateral approach is preferred, and in most patients length of skin incision is between 7 and 10 cm. Patient selection is important, and those with body mass index below 28 are the most suitable patients for these procedures. Custom instrumentation is needed to perform these procedures to allow visualization and prevent excessive trauma and traction on the soft tissues. Epidural hypotensive anesthesia and a monoblock acetabular component has facilitated the procedure significantly. In 2 studies, one a randomized trial, blood loss was significantly less and recovery was more rapid. Radiographic measurements of cup and stem position and cement technique were similar to longer, more traditional approaches. The surgeon should be experienced in hip surgery to perform these procedures well and must never compromise hip arthroplasty outcome by these less invasive approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15190555     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  23 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Douglas J Roger; David Hill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Early discharge and recovery with three minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty approaches: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Shelly A Smits
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty - what must be spared?].

Authors:  M Hoberg; M Rudert; B Tillmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps; John A Scanelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-01-18

6.  Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley P Graw; Steven T Woolson; Heather G Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Repantis; T Bouras; P Korovessis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 8.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Atul F Kamath; Michael J Taunton; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with the anterior approach.

Authors:  B Sonny Bal; Santaram Vallurupalli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.