Literature DB >> 15190361

Analysis of phylogenetic relationship among five mulberry (Morus) species using molecular markers.

K Vijayan1, P P Srivastava, A K Awasthi.   

Abstract

Species identification in mulberry (Morus) continues to be a point of great debate among scientists despite the number of criteria such as floral characters, wood, and leaf anatomical and biochemical characters used to identify the species within this genus. However, no consensus system of classification has emerged. Hence, an investigation was undertaken with inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers to find out the possibility of using these DNA markers to confirm the identity of genotypes in a particular species. Fifteen ISSR and 15 RAPD primers generated 86% and 78% polymorphism, respectively, among 19 mulberry genotypes. The polymorphism among the species varied from 50% to 57% in ISSR markers and 31% to 53% in RAPD markers. Similarity coefficients were higher among the genotypes of M. latifolia, M. bombycis and M. alba. Cluster analyses separated genotypes of M. laevigata and M. indica from those of the other species. Population structure analysis of these species further showed high genetic differentiation coefficients (GST), high heterozygosity between two species (DST), and total heterozygosity among populations (Ht) coupled with considerably low gene flow (Nm) when M. laevigata was paired with other species. Based on these parameters and the result of cluster analysis it is concluded that M. laevigata can be considered as a separate species of mulberry, whereas the other four species may be grouped together and treated as subspecies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15190361     DOI: 10.1139/g03-147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  8 in total

1.  Single primer amplification reaction methods reveal exotic and indigenous mulberry varieties are similarly diverse.

Authors:  Esha Bhattacharya; S B Dandin; Shirish Anand Ranade
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Improvement of abiotic stress adaptive traits in mulberry (Morus spp.): an update on biotechnological interventions.

Authors:  Tanmoy Sarkar; Thallapally Mogili; Vankadara Sivaprasad
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  The advent of genomics in mulberry and perspectives for productivity enhancement.

Authors:  Paramjit Khurana; Vibha G Checker
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Genetic relationship in mulberry (Morus L.) inferred through PCR-RFLP and trnD-trnT sequence data of chloroplast DNA.

Authors:  Dechang Hu; Ping Zhang; Yan-Lin Sun; Shumin Zhang; Zhaohong Wang; Chuanjie Chen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.632

5.  Molecular phylogeny of mulberries reconstructed from ITS and two cpDNA sequences.

Authors:  Yahui Xuan; Yue Wu; Peng Li; Ruiling Liu; Yiwei Luo; Jianglian Yuan; Zhonghuai Xiang; Ningjia He
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  DNA methods for identification of Chinese medicinal materials.

Authors:  Pui Ying Yip; Chi Fai Chau; Chun Yin Mak; Hoi Shan Kwan
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.455

7.  Definition of Eight Mulberry Species in the Genus Morus by Internal Transcribed Spacer-Based Phylogeny.

Authors:  Qiwei Zeng; Hongyu Chen; Chao Zhang; Minjing Han; Tian Li; Xiwu Qi; Zhonghuai Xiang; Ningjia He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Morus spp. and assessment of their transferability to other closely related species.

Authors:  Balachandran Mathithumilan; Niteen Narharirao Kadam; Jyoti Biradar; Sowmya H Reddy; Mahadeva Ankaiah; Madhura J Narayanan; Udayakumar Makarla; Paramjit Khurana; Sheshshayee Madavalam Sreeman
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.215

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.