Literature DB >> 15189258

Case representation by medical experts, intermediates and novices for laboratory data presented with or without a clinical context.

Peter P J L Verkoeijen1, Remy M J P Rikers, Henk G Schmidt, Margje W J van de Wiel, Jeroen P Kooman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on cognitive psychological research, a number of theoretical frameworks have been put forward to describe the structure of experts' medical knowledge and to explain experts' case-processing.
PURPOSE: To provide evidence for the theory of knowledge encapsulation, which states that medical knowledge constitutes of interlinked biomedical and clinical knowledge.
METHODS: Fourth-year medical students, clerks and medical experts evaluated six case descriptions, consisting of laboratory data either with or without a clinical context. For each case description, the participants were required to study the case, to formulate a diagnosis, and to write down everything they could remember of the case.
RESULTS: When the laboratory data were not embedded within a clinical context, medical experts' case-processing increased and their diagnostic accuracy became worse. Furthermore, laboratory data recall of medical experts was more elaborate in cases where the laboratory data were presented without a clinical context. Similar results were obtained for students and clerks.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings are only partially consistent with a prediction made by the theory of knowledge encapsulation. Further research, using a different paradigm than the traditionally used method of free recall, is required to unearth whether medical experts use qualitatively different knowledge structures than novices while solving cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189258     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic thinking and information used in clinical decision-making: a qualitative study of expert and student dental clinicians.

Authors:  Gerardo Maupomé; Stuart Schrader; Saurabh Mannan; Lawrence Garetto; Hafsteinn Eggertsson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  How case representations of medical students change during case processing - Results of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Leah Theresa Braun; Benedikt Lenzer; Jan Kiesewetter; Martin R Fischer; Ralf Schmidmaier
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-15

3.  Five decades of research and theorization on clinical reasoning: a critical review.

Authors:  Shahram Yazdani; Maryam Hoseini Abardeh
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-27

4.  Bedside teaching without bedside - an introduction to clinical reasoning in COVID-19 times.

Authors:  Pia Djermester; Christian Gröschke; Robert Gintrowicz; Harm Peters; Antje Degel
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Categorizing patients in a forced-choice triad task: the integration of context in patient management.

Authors:  Sarah L Devantier; John Paul Minda; Mark Goldszmidt; Wael Haddara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using concept mapping to evaluate knowledge structure in problem-based learning.

Authors:  Chia-Hui Hung; Chen-Yung Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.