Charlotte E Rees1. 1. Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heritree Road, Exeter EX1 8BX, UK. charlotte.rees@pms.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Educators across the world are charged with the responsibility of producing core learning outcomes for medical curricula. However, much educational theory exists which deliberates the value of learning outcomes in education. AIMS: This paper aims to discuss the problems surrounding outcomes-based curricula in medical education, using insights from educational theory. DISCUSSION: The paper begins with a discussion of the traditions, values and ideologies of medical curricula. It continues by analysing the issue of control within the curriculum and argues that curriculum designers and teachers control product-orientated curricula, leading to student disempowerment. The paper debates outcomes-based curricula from an ideological perspective and argues that learning outcomes cannot specify exactly what is to be achieved as a result of learning. CONCLUSIONS: The paper argues that medical schools should adopt a model for co-operative control of the curriculum, thus empowering learners. The paper also suggests that medical educators should determine the value of precise learning outcomes before blindly adopting an outcomes-based model.
BACKGROUND: Educators across the world are charged with the responsibility of producing core learning outcomes for medical curricula. However, much educational theory exists which deliberates the value of learning outcomes in education. AIMS: This paper aims to discuss the problems surrounding outcomes-based curricula in medical education, using insights from educational theory. DISCUSSION: The paper begins with a discussion of the traditions, values and ideologies of medical curricula. It continues by analysing the issue of control within the curriculum and argues that curriculum designers and teachers control product-orientated curricula, leading to student disempowerment. The paper debates outcomes-based curricula from an ideological perspective and argues that learning outcomes cannot specify exactly what is to be achieved as a result of learning. CONCLUSIONS: The paper argues that medical schools should adopt a model for co-operative control of the curriculum, thus empowering learners. The paper also suggests that medical educators should determine the value of precise learning outcomes before blindly adopting an outcomes-based model.
Authors: Allen F Shaughnessy; Jennifer Sparks; Molly Cohen-Osher; Kristen H Goodell; Gregory L Sawin; Joseph Gravel Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2013-03
Authors: Gavin D Perkins; Hannah Barrett; Ian Bullock; David A Gabbott; Jerry P Nolan; Sarah Mitchell; Alasdair Short; Christopher M Smith; Gary B Smith; Susan Todd; Julian F Bion Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Charlotte Denniston; Elizabeth Molloy; Debra Nestel; Robyn Woodward-Kron; Jennifer L Keating Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.692