Literature DB >> 15187293

Quantitative proteomics: a review of different methodologies.

Pier Giorgio Righetti1, Natascia Campostrini, Jennifer Pascali, Mahmoud Hamdan, Hubert Astner.   

Abstract

The present review attempts to cover the vast array of methods which have appeared in the last few years for performing quantitative proteome analysis. These methods are divided into two classes: those applicable to conventional two-dimensional map analysis, coupling orthogonally a charge-based step (isoelectric focusing) to a size-based separation [sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-electrophoresis] and those applicable to two-dimensional chromatographic protocols. The first method, although being by and large the most popular approach, can offer differential display of paired samples with relatively few methods, the oldest one being based on statistical analysis performed on sets of gels via powerful software packages, such as the MELANIE, PDQuest, Z3 and Z4000, Phoretix and Progenesis. Recent developments comprise analysis performed on a single gel containing mixed samples differentially labeled, either with fluorophors (Cy3 and Cy5) or with d(0)/d(3) acrylamide. Conversely, chromatographic approaches, which mostly rely on analysis not of intact proteins but of their tryptic digests, offer a panoply of differential labeling protocols, most of which rely on stable isotope tagging. Essentially, all possible reactions have been described, such as those involving Lys, Asp, Glu, Cys residues, as well as a number of methods exploiting differential derivatization of amine and carboxyl groups generated during proteolysis. All such methods are described and evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15187293     DOI: 10.1255/ejms.600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)        ISSN: 1469-0667            Impact factor:   1.067


  15 in total

1.  One hundred years of high-throughput Drosophila research.

Authors:  Mathias Beller; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Quantitative proteome analysis using D-labeled N-ethylmaleimide and 13C-labeled iodoacetanilide by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sadamu Kurono; Tamie Kurono; Naoka Komori; Satomi Niwayama; Hiroyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Peptide and protein quantification using iTRAQ with electron transfer dissociation.

Authors:  Doug Phanstiel; Yi Zhang; Jarrod A Marto; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Neuroproteomics as a promising tool in Parkinson's disease research.

Authors:  Ilse S Pienaar; William M U Daniels; Jürgen Götz
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Absolute Quantitation of Oxidizable Peptides by Coulometric Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Pengyi Zhao; Richard N Zare; Hao Chen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Multiple-approaches to the identification and quantification of cytochromes P450 in human liver tissue by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Cathrin Seibert; Brian R Davidson; Barry J Fuller; Laurence H Patterson; William J Griffiths; Yuqin Wang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Microproteomics: analysis of protein diversity in small samples.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 8.  Adapting mass spectrometry-based platforms for clinical proteomics applications: The capillary electrophoresis coupled mass spectrometry paradigm.

Authors:  Jochen Metzger; Peter B Luppa; David M Good; Harald Mischak
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 9.  Perspective: proteomic approach to detect biomarkers of human growth hormone.

Authors:  Juan Ding; Edward O List; Shigeru Okada; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 10.  Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry as a powerful tool in biomarker discovery and clinical diagnosis: an update of recent developments.

Authors:  Harald Mischak; Joshua J Coon; Jan Novak; Eva M Weissinger; Joost P Schanstra; Anna F Dominiczak
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.