OBJECTIVE: To assess noise exposure during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with different types of interface (helmet, nasal, and facial masks). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten "naive" healthy volunteers underwent NIV at pressure support levels of 10 and 15 cmH2O with: (a) helmet, (b) helmet equipped with HME filters at the junctions between the helmet and the inspiratory and expiratory branches of the respiratory circuit, (c) nasal mask, and (d) facial mask. Noise intensity was assessed with a sound level meter by placing a microphone near the right ear. Noise intensity and degree of discomfort were also assessed subjectively with a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Inside the helmet noise exceeded 100 dB. Noise intensity was poorly affected by pressure support level and unaffected by the presence of HME filters. During NIV with nasal or facial masks the noise did not exceed 70 dB (i.e., noise was not louder than the usual noise background in ICU). Subjective evaluation of noise intensity mirrored objective measurements; however, the presence of HME filters was associated with the feeling of less noise inside the helmet. The discomfort associated with the helmet did not significantly differ from that associated with the masks. CONCLUSIONS: NIV helmet is associated with significantly greater noise than nasal and facial masks, but is as comfortable as masks, at least in the short term. Medium- and long-term exposure to loud noise may potentially impair ear function and increase the patient's discomfort.
OBJECTIVE: To assess noise exposure during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with different types of interface (helmet, nasal, and facial masks). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten "naive" healthy volunteers underwent NIV at pressure support levels of 10 and 15 cmH2O with: (a) helmet, (b) helmet equipped with HME filters at the junctions between the helmet and the inspiratory and expiratory branches of the respiratory circuit, (c) nasal mask, and (d) facial mask. Noise intensity was assessed with a sound level meter by placing a microphone near the right ear. Noise intensity and degree of discomfort were also assessed subjectively with a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Inside the helmet noise exceeded 100 dB. Noise intensity was poorly affected by pressure support level and unaffected by the presence of HME filters. During NIV with nasal or facial masks the noise did not exceed 70 dB (i.e., noise was not louder than the usual noise background in ICU). Subjective evaluation of noise intensity mirrored objective measurements; however, the presence of HME filters was associated with the feeling of less noise inside the helmet. The discomfort associated with the helmet did not significantly differ from that associated with the masks. CONCLUSIONS: NIV helmet is associated with significantly greater noise than nasal and facial masks, but is as comfortable as masks, at least in the short term. Medium- and long-term exposure to loud noise may potentially impair ear function and increase the patient's discomfort.
Authors: S Nava; N Ambrosino; E Clini; M Prato; G Orlando; M Vitacca; P Brigada; C Fracchia; F Rubini Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-05-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: E Girou; F Schortgen; C Delclaux; C Brun-Buisson; F Blot; Y Lefort; F Lemaire; L Brochard Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-11-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jonathan Y Gabor; Andrew B Cooper; Shelley A Crombach; Bert Lee; Nisha Kadikar; Harald E Bettger; Patrick J Hanly Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: M Antonelli; G Conti; M Rocco; M Bufi; R A De Blasi; G Vivino; A Gasparetto; G U Meduri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesco Mojoli; Giorgio A Iotti; Ilaria Currò; Marco Pozzi; Gabriele Via; Aaron Venti; Antonio Braschi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-12-18 Impact factor: 17.440