Literature DB >> 15183714

Aberrant endosperm development in interploidy crosses reveals a timer of differentiation.

Karl-Hartmut von Wangenheim1, Hans-Peter Peterson.   

Abstract

The common assumption that the seed failure in interploidy crosses of flowering plants is due to parental genomic imprinting is based on vague interpretations and needs reevaluation since the general question is involved, how differentiation is timed so that cell progenies, while specializing, pass through proper numbers of amplification divisions before proliferation ceases. As recently confirmed, endosperm differentiation is accelerated or de-accelerated, depending upon whether polyploid females are crossed with diploid males, or vice-versa. Unlike the zygote, the first cell of the endosperm is determined to produce a tissue that successively induces growth of maternal tissues, stimulates and nourishes the embryo, and finally ceases cell cycling. Altered timing of endosperm differentiation, thus, perturbs seed development. During fertilization, only the female genomes contribute cytoplasmic equivalents to endosperm development so that in interploidy crosses, the initial amount of cytoplasm per chromosome set is altered, and due to semi-autonomy of cytoplasmic growth, altered numbers of division cycles are needed to provide the amount of cytoplasmic organelles required for differentiation. Cytoplasmic semi-autonomy and dependence of differentiation on an increase in cytoplasm has been shown in other tissues of plants and animals, thus, revealing a common mechanism for intracellular timing of differentiation. As demonstrated, imprinted genes can alter the extent of cell proliferation by interfering with this mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183714     DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  10 in total

Review 1.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Balance between maternal and paternal alleles sets the timing of resource accumulation in the maize endosperm.

Authors:  Na Li; Hugh G Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evidence for parent-of-origin effects and interparental conflict in seeds of an ancient flowering plant lineage.

Authors:  Rebecca A Povilus; Pamela K Diggle; William E Friedman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Differences in Effective Ploidy Drive Genome-Wide Endosperm Expression Polarization and Seed Failure in Wild Tomato Hybrids.

Authors:  Morgane Roth; Ana M Florez-Rueda; Thomas Städler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Paternally Acting Canonical RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Pathway Genes Sensitize Arabidopsis Endosperm to Paternal Genome Dosage.

Authors:  Prasad R V Satyaki; Mary Gehring
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  The AGL62 MADS domain protein regulates cellularization during endosperm development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Il-Ho Kang; Joshua G Steffen; Michael F Portereiko; Alan Lloyd; Gary N Drews
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 7.  The role of cell differentiation in controlling cell multiplication and cancer.

Authors:  Karl-Hartmut von Wangenheim; Hans-Peter Peterson
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  The triploid endosperm genome of Arabidopsis adopts a peculiar, parental-dosage-dependent chromatin organization.

Authors:  Célia Baroux; Ales Pecinka; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  The maternally expressed WRKY transcription factor TTG2 controls lethality in interploidy crosses of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Brian P Dilkes; Melissa Spielman; Renate Weizbauer; Brian Watson; Diana Burkart-Waco; Rod J Scott; Luca Comai
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The evolution of imprinting in plants: beyond the seed.

Authors:  Sean A Montgomery; Frédéric Berger
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.767

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.