Literature DB >> 15183437

The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads.

G Li1, L E DeFrate, S Zayontz, S E Park, T J Gill.   

Abstract

Altered patellofemoral joint contact pressures are thought to contribute to patellofemoral joint symptoms. However, little is known about the relationship between tibiofemoral joint kinematics and patellofemoral joint contact pressures. The objective of this paper was to investigate the effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral joint pressures using an established in vitro robotic testing experimental setup. Eight cadaveric knee specimens were tested at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion under an isolated quadriceps load of 400 N and a combined quadriceps/hamstrings load of 400 N/200 N. Tibiofemoral joint kinematics were measured by the robot and contact pressures by a TekScan pressure sensor. The isolated quadriceps loading caused anterior translation and internal rotation of the tibia up to 60 degrees of flexion and posterior translation and external rotation of the tibia beyond 60 degrees. The co-contraction of the hamstring muscles caused a posterior translation and external rotation of the tibia relative to the motion of the tibia under the quadriceps load. Correspondingly, the contact pressures were elevated significantly at all flexion angles. For example, at 60 degrees of flexion, the hamstrings co-contraction increased the posterior tibial translation by approximately 2.8 mm and external tibial rotation by approximately 3.6 degrees. The peak contact pressure increased from 1.4+/-0.8 to 1.7+/-1.0 MPa, a 15% increase. The elevated contact pressures after hamstrings co-contraction indicates an intrinsic relation between the tibiofemoral joint kinematics and the patellofemoral joint biomechanics. An increase in posterior tibial translation and external rotation is accompanied by an increase in contact pressure in the patellofemoral joint. These results imply that excessive strength conditioning with the hamstring muscles might not be beneficial to the patellofemoral joint. Knee pathology that causes an increase in tibial posterior translation and external rotation might contribute to degeneration of the patellofemoral joint. These results suggest that conservative treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injury should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183437     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  38 in total

1.  Proximal and distal kinematics in female runners with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Michael B Pohl; Zack Sanchez; Tom Cunningham; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Günther Maderbacher; Achim Benditz; Werner Müller; Joachim Grifka; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Increased medial foot loading during drop jump in subjects with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Michael S Rathleff; Camilla Richter; Christoffer Brushøj; Jesper Bencke; Thomas Bandholm; Per Hölmich; Kristian Thorborg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark F Brady; Michael P Bradley; Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  New methodology for multi-dimensional spinal joint testing with a parallel robot.

Authors:  Matthew R Walker; James P Dickey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  In vitro measurement of patellar kinematics following reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Sven Ostermeier; Marc Holst; Michael Bohnsack; Christof Hurschler; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Carl-Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The biomechanical function of the patellar tendon during in-vivo weight-bearing flexion.

Authors:  Louis E Defrate; Kyung Wook Nha; Ramprasad Papannagari; Jeremy M Moses; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and contact characteristics.

Authors:  Hans Kainz; Wolfgang Reng; Peter Augat; Simone Wurm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The association between antagonist hamstring coactivation and episodes of knee joint shifting and buckling.

Authors:  N A Segal; M C Nevitt; R D Welborn; U-S D T Nguyen; J Niu; C E Lewis; D T Felson; L Frey-Law
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Patellar tendon orientation and patellar tracking in male and female knees.

Authors:  Kartik M Varadarajan; Thomas J Gill; Andrew A Freiberg; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.