Literature DB >> 15182403

Eating behaviours, dietary profile and body composition according to dieting history in men and women of the Québec Family Study.

Véronique Provencher1, Vicky Drapeau, Angelo Tremblay, Jean-Pierre Després, Claude Bouchard, Simone Lemieux.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to compare eating behaviours (cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger), dietary profile and physiological variables according to the practice of dieting: current dieting; history of dieting in the 10-year period that preceded the study; no dieting during the same period. Dieting history, anthropometric markers of adiposity, RMR, dietary profile (3 d food record) and eating behaviours (three-factor eating questionnaire) were determined in a sample of 244 men and 352 women. A greater proportion of women (31.8 %) than men (16.8 %) reported that they had been on a diet over the past 10 years (P=0.0001). In both genders, current and past dieters had a higher BMI (P<0.05) than non-dieters and current dieters had lower reported energy intakes than past dieters and non-dieters (only in women) (P<0.05). Current and past dieters also had higher scores for all eating behaviours and their subscales (P<0.05; except for susceptibility to hunger in men) compared with non-dieters (adjusted for age, reported energy intake, percentage of dietary fat, BMI and RMR). Moreover, for each dieting-history category, women had significantly higher scores for cognitive dietary restraint than men (P<0.05). In conclusion, the present study showed that current and past dieters had higher scores for cognitive dietary restraint and disinhibition compared with non-dieters. As disinhibition has previously been associated with a greater risk of subsequent weight gain, interventions aimed at preventing an increase in disinhibition may be promising for long-term weight maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15182403     DOI: 10.1079/BJN20041115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  12 in total

1.  Interaction between disinhibition and restraint: Implications for body weight and eating disturbance.

Authors:  E J Bryant; K Kiezebrink; N A King; J E Blundell
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2010 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  History of weight cycling does not impede future weight loss or metabolic improvements in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Caitlin Mason; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Ikuyo Imayama; Liren Xiao; Angela Kong; Kristin L Campbell; Catherine R Duggan; Ching-Yun Wang; Catherine M Alfano; Cornelia M Ulrich; George L Blackburn; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.694

3.  Influence of Physical Activity Participation on the Associations between Eating Behaviour Traits and Body Mass Index in Healthy Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Riou; Eric Doucet; Véronique Provencher; S John Weisnagel; Marie-Eve Piché; Marie-Christine Dubé; Jean Bergeron; Simone Lemieux
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2010-09-14

4.  Patterns of weight control strategies predict differences in women's 4-year weight gain.

Authors:  Jennifer S Savage; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Identification and prediction of latent classes of weight-loss strategies among women.

Authors:  Stephanie T Lanza; Jennifer S Savage; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Pregravid weight is associated with prior dietary restraint and psychosocial factors during pregnancy.

Authors:  Barbara A Laraia; Anna M Siega-Riz; Nancy Dole; Emily London
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Long-term effectiveness of the community-based Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) lifestyle intervention: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lillian Kent; Darren Morton; Trevor Hurlow; Paul Rankin; Althea Hanna; Hans Diehl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Body weight status, eating behavior, sensitivity to reward/punishment, and gender: relationships and interdependencies.

Authors:  Anja Dietrich; Martin Federbusch; Claudia Grellmann; Arno Villringer; Annette Horstmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

9.  Psychometric properties of Spanish version of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 (Tfeq-Sp) and its relationship with some eating- and body image-related variables.

Authors:  Ignacio Jáuregui-Lobera; Patricia García-Cruz; Rocío Carbonero-Carreño; Alejandro Magallares; Inmaculada Ruiz-Prieto
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Exploring the Relationship between Body Composition and Eating Behavior Using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in Young New Zealand Women.

Authors:  Rozanne Kruger; Jacqui G De Bray; Kathryn L Beck; Cathryn A Conlon; Welma Stonehouse
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.