Literature DB >> 15182401

The use of glycaemic index tables to predict glycaemic index of composite breakfast meals.

Anne Flint1, Bente K Møller, Anne Raben, Dorthe Pedersen, Inge Tetens, Jens J Holst, Arne Astrup.   

Abstract

The applicability of the glycaemic index (GI) in the context of mixed meals and diets is still debatable. The objective of the present study was to investigate the predictability of measured GI in composite breakfast meals when calculated from table values, and to develop prediction equations using meal components. Furthermore, we aimed to study the relationship between GI and insulinaemic index (II). The study was a randomised cross-over meal test including twenty-eight healthy young men. Thirteen breakfast meals and a reference meal were tested. All meals contained 50 g available carbohydrate, but differed considerably in energy and macronutrient composition. Venous blood was sampled for 2 h and analysed for glucose and insulin. Prediction equations were made by regression analysis. No association was found between predicted and measured GI. The meal content of energy and fat was inversely associated with GI (R(2) 0.93 and 0.88, respectively; P<0.001). Carbohydrate content (expressed as percentage of energy) was positively related to GI (R(2) 0.80; P<0.001). Using multivariate analysis the GI of meals was best predicted by fat and protein contents (R(2) 0.93; P<0.001). There was no association between GI and II. In conclusion, the present results show that the GI of mixed meals calculated by table values does not predict the measured GI and furthermore that carbohydrates do not play the most important role for GI in mixed breakfast meals. Our prediction models show that the GI of mixed meals is more strongly correlated either with fat and protein content, or with energy content, than with carbohydrate content alone. Furthermore, GI was not correlated with II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15182401     DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  23 in total

1.  Development of a clinical type 1 diabetes metabolic system model and in silico simulation tool.

Authors:  Xing-Wei Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

2.  Estimating the reliability of glycemic index values and potential sources of methodological and biological variability.

Authors:  Nirupa R Matthan; Lynne M Ausman; Huicui Meng; Hocine Tighiouart; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Reply to TMS Wolever.

Authors:  Huicui Meng; Nirupa R Matthan; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Changes in intake of protein foods, carbohydrate amount and quality, and long-term weight change: results from 3 prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Jessica D Smith; Tao Hou; David S Ludwig; Eric B Rimm; Walter Willett; Frank B Hu; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Effect of chicken, fat and vegetable on glycaemia and insulinaemia to a white rice-based meal in healthy adults.

Authors:  Lijuan Sun; Dinesh Viren Ranawana; Melvin Khee-Shing Leow; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Effect of prior meal macronutrient composition on postprandial glycemic responses and glycemic index and glycemic load value determinations.

Authors:  Huicui Meng; Nirupa R Matthan; Lynne M Ausman; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 7.  White vegetables: glycemia and satiety.

Authors:  G Harvey Anderson; Chesarahmia Dojo Soeandy; Christopher E Smith
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  No effect of a diet with a reduced glycaemic index on satiety, energy intake and body weight in overweight and obese women.

Authors:  L M Aston; C S Stokes; S A Jebb
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  The influence of dietary fibre source and gender on the postprandial glucose and lipid response in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Matilda Ulmius; Anna Johansson; Gunilla Onning
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Glycemic load, dietary fiber, and added sugar and fecundability in 2 preconception cohorts.

Authors:  Sydney K Willis; Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Katherine L Tucker; Ellen Trolle; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.