Prasad V S V Neti1, Roger W Howell. 1. Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Radiopharmaceuticals are generally distributed nonuniformly in tissue. At the microscopic level, only a fraction of the cells in tissue are labeled. Consequently, the labeled cells receive an absorbed dose from radioactivity within the cell (self-dose) as well as an absorbed dose from radioactivity in surrounding cells (cross-dose). On the other hand, unlabeled cells only receive a cross-dose. This work uses a novel approach to examine the lethal effects of microscopic nonuniformities of (131)I individually on the labeled and unlabeled cells. METHODS: A multicellular tissue model was used to investigate the lethality of microscopic nonuniform distributions of (131)I. Mammalian cells (V79) were dyed with CFDA-SE (carboxy fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester) and labeled with (131)I-iododeoxyuridine ((131)IdU). The dyed labeled cells were then mixed with equal numbers of unlabeled cells, and 3-dimensional tissue constructs (4 x 10(6) cells) were formed by centrifugation in a small tube. This resulted in a uniform distribution of (131)I at the macroscopic level but nonuniform distribution at the multicellular level, wherein 50% of the cells were labeled. The multicellular clusters were maintained at 10.5 degrees C for 72 h to allow (131)I decays to accumulate. The clusters were then dismantled and the labeled (dyed) and unlabeled (undyed) cells were separately seeded for colony formation using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. RESULTS: The unlabeled cells, which received only a cross-dose, exhibited a mean lethal dose D(37) of 4.0 +/- 0.3 Gy. In contrast, the labeled cells received both a self-dose and a cross-dose. Isolating the effects of the self-dose resulted in a D(37) of 1.2 +/- 0.3 Gy, which was about 3.3 times more toxic per unit dose than the cross-dose. The reason for these differences appears to be primarily related to the higher relative biological effectiveness of the self-dose delivered by (131)IdU compared with the cross-dose. Theoretical modeling of the killing of labeled and unlabeled cells was achieved by considering the cellular self-doses and cross-doses. CONCLUSION: Cellular self-doses and cross-doses play an important role in determining the biological response of tissue to microscopic nonuniform distributions of (131)I. Prediction of the biological response requires that both self-doses and cross-doses be considered along with their relative lethality per unit dose.
UNLABELLED: Radiopharmaceuticals are generally distributed nonuniformly in tissue. At the microscopic level, only a fraction of the cells in tissue are labeled. Consequently, the labeled cells receive an absorbed dose from radioactivity within the cell (self-dose) as well as an absorbed dose from radioactivity in surrounding cells (cross-dose). On the other hand, unlabeled cells only receive a cross-dose. This work uses a novel approach to examine the lethal effects of microscopic nonuniformities of (131)I individually on the labeled and unlabeled cells. METHODS: A multicellular tissue model was used to investigate the lethality of microscopic nonuniform distributions of (131)I. Mammalian cells (V79) were dyed with CFDA-SE (carboxy fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester) and labeled with (131)I-iododeoxyuridine ((131)IdU). The dyed labeled cells were then mixed with equal numbers of unlabeled cells, and 3-dimensional tissue constructs (4 x 10(6) cells) were formed by centrifugation in a small tube. This resulted in a uniform distribution of (131)I at the macroscopic level but nonuniform distribution at the multicellular level, wherein 50% of the cells were labeled. The multicellular clusters were maintained at 10.5 degrees C for 72 h to allow (131)I decays to accumulate. The clusters were then dismantled and the labeled (dyed) and unlabeled (undyed) cells were separately seeded for colony formation using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. RESULTS: The unlabeled cells, which received only a cross-dose, exhibited a mean lethal dose D(37) of 4.0 +/- 0.3 Gy. In contrast, the labeled cells received both a self-dose and a cross-dose. Isolating the effects of the self-dose resulted in a D(37) of 1.2 +/- 0.3 Gy, which was about 3.3 times more toxic per unit dose than the cross-dose. The reason for these differences appears to be primarily related to the higher relative biological effectiveness of the self-dose delivered by (131)IdU compared with the cross-dose. Theoretical modeling of the killing of labeled and unlabeled cells was achieved by considering the cellular self-doses and cross-doses. CONCLUSION: Cellular self-doses and cross-doses play an important role in determining the biological response of tissue to microscopic nonuniform distributions of (131)I. Prediction of the biological response requires that both self-doses and cross-doses be considered along with their relative lethality per unit dose.
Authors: R W Howell; B W Wessels; R Loevinger; E E Watson; W E Bolch; A B Brill; N D Charkes; D R Fisher; M T Hays; J S Robertson; J A Siegel; S R Thomas Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G M Makrigiorgos; A I Kassis; J Baranowska-Kortylewicz; K D McElvany; M J Welch; K S Sastry; S J Adelstein Journal: Radiat Res Date: 1989-06 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: R W Howell; P V S V Neti; M Pinto; B I Gerashchenko; V R Narra; E I Azzam Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2007-02-06 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Jay H Solanki; Thomas Tritt; Jordan B Pasternack; Julia J Kim; Calvin N Leung; Jason D Domogauer; Nicholas W Colangelo; Venkat R Narra; Roger W Howell Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Marjolaine Roche; Prasad V S V Neti; Francis W Kemp; Amit Agrawal; Alicia Attanasio; Véronique Douard; Anjali Muduli; Edouard I Azzam; Edward Norkus; Michael Brimacombe; Roger W Howell; Ronaldo P Ferraris Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.619