Literature DB >> 15180101

Participation behavior of bladder cancer survivors in a medical follow-up survey on quality of life in France.

Tomohiro Matsuda1, Hélène Marche, Pascale Grosclaude, Serge Clement.   

Abstract

The objectives were to ascertain the sociodemographic background of bladder cancer survivors acting on their participation behavior to a medical follow-up survey. This population-based quality of life (QOL) survey was realized by mail with 201 survivors (M:F = 171:30, median age = 74 years, range 33-99) randomly selected from the 1731 patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in two regions of France. Response rate was 47.3%. Female and younger survivors were more receptive to the survey than were males and older survivors. Furthermore, survivors who had experienced a cystectomy were more responsive than those who did not. Similarly, the length of time since a major treatment was significant, with a shorter interval associated with a better response. The missing item rate in the QOL questionnaire was 13.8%. Other variables were not significantly associated with acceptance of the survey. Missing items among the responders were found more often in the sub-scale of social/familial well-being (15.6%). The older and male subjects left more questions blank. The reason for this low response rate can be categorized to the following three points: (1) Physically and psychologically not motivated to answer, (2) sensitive and private content of the question, and (3) methodological problem. Clearer concepts of the research would have helped the participants understand the objectives and better relate to the survey. Subsequently, these three issues should be given more attention in organizing questionnaire survey for improved participation rates in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15180101     DOI: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000024703.54660.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  30 in total

1.  Non-participation in a population-based seroprevalence study of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Authors:  H E De Melker; N J Nagelkerde; M A Conyn-van Spaendonck
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  S C Hoffman; A E Burke; K J Helzlsouer; G W Comstock
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: missing items.

Authors:  P M Fayers; D Curran; D Machin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  [Prevalence of cancer, health care and daily life assistance in people aged 75 or over living in the Tarn area (France)].

Authors:  B Faliu; F Berthier; P Grosclaude; I Aptel; F Cayla; M Machelard-Roumagnac; Y Duchene
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  Embodying illness, embodying cancer.

Authors:  D R Gordon
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1990-06

7.  Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Benfante; D Reed; C MacLean; A Kagan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with an ileal conduit, cutaneous or urethral kock pouch.

Authors:  S Hart; E C Skinner; B E Meyerowitz; S Boyd; G Lieskovsky; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Factors affecting response to an invitation to attend for a health check.

Authors:  M Thorogood; A Coulter; L Jones; P Yudkin; J Muir; D Mant
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Quality of life assessment in clinical cancer research.

Authors:  M Olschewski; G Schulgen; M Schumacher; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality of life of testicular cancer survivors and the relationship with sociodemographics, cancer-related variables, and life events.

Authors:  J Fleer; H J Hoekstra; D T Sleijfer; M A Tuinman; E C Klip; J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Authors:  Samantha J Mason; James W F Catto; Amy Downing; Sarah E Bottomley; Adam W Glaser; Penny Wright
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.588

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.