Literature DB >> 15179648

Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.

Keith D Cicerone1, Tasha Mott, Joanne Azulay, John C Friel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive cognitive rehabilitation program (ICRP) compared with standard neurorehabilitation (SRP) for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled intervention trial.
SETTING: Community-based, postacute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation program. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six persons with TBI.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants in ICRP (n=27) received an intensive, highly structured program of integrated cognitive and psychosocial interventions based on principles of holistic neuropsychologic rehabilitation. Participants in SRP (n=29) received comprehensive neurorehabilitation consisting primarily of physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychologic treatment. Duration of treatment was approximately 4 months for both interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); and Quality of Community Integration Questionnaire assessing satisfaction with community functioning and satisfaction with cognitive functioning. Neuropsychologic functioning was evaluated for the ICRP participants.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement on the CIQ, with the ICRP group exhibiting a significant treatment effect compared with the SRP group. Analysis of clinically significant improvement indicated that ICRP participants were over twice as likely to show clinical benefit on the CIQ (odds ratio=2.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-7.2). ICRP participants showed significant improvement in overall neuropsychologic functioning; participants with clinically significant improvement on the CIQ also showed greater improvement of neuropsychologic functioning. Satisfaction with community functioning was not related to community integration after treatment. Satisfaction with cognitive functioning made a significant contribution to posttreatment community integration; this finding may reflect the mediating effects of perceived self-efficacy on functional outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive, holistic, cognitive rehabilitation is an effective form of rehabilitation, particularly for persons with TBI who have previously been unable to resume community functioning. Perceived self-efficacy may have significant impact on functional outcomes after TBI rehabilitation. Measures of social participation and subjective well-being appear to represent distinct and separable rehabilitation outcomes after TBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15179648     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  23 in total

Review 1.  Community neurorehabilitation: a synthesis of current evidence and future research directions.

Authors:  Sarah E Chard
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

2.  Measuring participation in people living with multiple sclerosis: a comparison of self-reported frequency, importance and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Kathryn M Yorkston; Carrie M Kuehn; Kurt L Johnson; Dawn M Ehde; Mark P Jensen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Self-efficacy beliefs mediate the relationship between subjective cognitive functioning and physical and mental well-being after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Lisa M Wu; Jane Austin; Jada G Hamilton; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Luis Isola; Scott Rowley; Rachel Warbet; Gary Winkel; William H Redd; Christine Rini
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Traumatic Brain Injury Incidence, Clinical Overview, and Policies in the US Military Health System Since 2000.

Authors:  Thomas M Swanson; Brad M Isaacson; Cherina M Cyborski; Louis M French; Jack W Tsao; Paul F Pasquina
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Establishing the Factor Structure of a Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement System for Caregivers of Persons Living With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jason H Raad; David S Tulsky; Rael T Lange; Tracey A Brickell; Angelle M Sander; Robin A Hanks; Louis French; Jennifer A Miner; Pamela A Kisala; Noelle E Carlozzi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Racial Differences in Discharge Location After a Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Aparna Vadlamani; Justin A Perry; Maureen McCunn; Deborah M Stein; Jennifer S Albrecht
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The mental health sequelae of traumatic head injury in South Vietnamese ex-political detainees who survived torture.

Authors:  Richard F Mollica; Miriam C Chernoff; S Megan Berthold; James Lavelle; In Kyoon Lyoo; Perry Renshaw
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 8.  Techniques and devices to restore cognition.

Authors:  Mijail Demian Serruya; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Evaluation of autonomies in the severely brain injured: the Progression of Autonomies Scale.

Authors:  Francesco Arcuri; Lucia F Lucca; Vera Rosadini; Giuseppe Mercurio; Anna Mazzucchi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

10.  Race and insurance disparities in discharge to rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anthony O Asemota; Benjamin P George; Carolyn J Cumpsty-Fowler; Adil H Haider; Eric B Schneider
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.