Literature DB >> 1517894

Improve your hospital autopsy rate to 40-50 per cent, a tale of two towns.

C Champ1, X Tyler, P S Andrews, S B Coghill.   

Abstract

In the light of medical audit, all pathology departments are scrutinizing their hospital autopsy rate. In most countries, the rate has fallen over the last few decades to between 10 and 20 per cent. However, it is still possible to achieve a much higher rate. We compare two neighbouring District General Hospitals (DGHs): Northampton, with the more usual autopsy rate of 11 per cent, and Kettering, with a higher rate of 40-50 per cent. These hospitals are comparable in almost every way except for the system used to request permission for an autopsy. These differences were evaluated and the following factors were found to be of importance in achieving a high rate: (1) centralization of death certificates within the mortuary and personal contact between the certifying doctor and the relatives within the bereavement room; (2) mortuary pathology technicians are designated as bereavement officers and act as coordinators between relatives, clinicians, and pathologists; and (3) regular clinico-pathological meetings and a positive attitude to autopsies by clinicians.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1517894     DOI: 10.1002/path.1711660413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of necropsy request behaviour of clinicians.

Authors:  R D Start; S G Brain; T A McCulloch; C A Angel
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A survey of general practitioners' views on autopsy reports.

Authors:  S Karunaratne; E W Benbow
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Death certification: an audit of practice entering the 21st century.

Authors:  B Swift; K West
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Ethics and necropsies.

Authors:  E W Benbow
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Attitudes of junior medical staff to requesting permission for autopsy.

Authors:  S A Hinchliffe; H W Godfrey; C R Hind
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Reporting deaths to coroners.

Authors:  S Leadbeatter; B Knight
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-17

7.  Surgical audit without autopsy: tales of the unexpected.

Authors:  C S Champ
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Cytopathology in the post mortem room.

Authors:  E Walker; J J Going
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; Danny F McAuley; Sarah Davies; Fang Gao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Can low autopsy rates be increased? Yes, we can! Should postmortem examinations in oncology be performed? Yes, we should! A postmortem analysis of oncological cases.

Authors:  Johanna Waidhauser; Benedikt Martin; Martin Trepel; Bruno Märkl
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.064

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.