PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging characteristics and artifacts of a nitinol stent with distal tantalum markers with computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vascular phantom was built to simulate in-stent restenosis. A nitinol stent with tantalum markers (Luminexx stent) was evaluated with CT angiography in different orientations relative to the z-axis and with MR angiography in different positions relative to both B0 and the readout gradient. Stenosis measurements were compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography for both modalities. In-stent signal intensity obtained with different flip angles was assessed in two nitinol stents with distal markers (Luminexx stent and SMART stent) and one without markers (Memotherm-FLEXX stent). RESULTS: Stenosis detection was not possible with CT angiography when the stent was perpendicular to the z-axis because of streak-like artifacts induced by tantalum markers. Stenosis evaluation with multiplanar reformation was accurate when the stent was in parallel and oblique orientations relative to the table axis. With MR angiography, metallic artifacts were mostly related to the stent orientation with B0, whereas orientation of the readout gradient had little influence. The mean error (overestimation) for stenosis measurements varied between 0.1% and 7.4% for CT imaging in parallel and oblique positions and 3.6% and 9.5% for MR imaging. Higher flip angles did not improve signal intensity inside the three stents tested. CONCLUSION: CT and MR angiography can be used for evaluating the patency of stents with distal markers that are parallel or oblique relative to the table axis (iliac, carotid, or femoral stents). MR angiography is preferred if the stent is perpendicular to the table axis (renal stent).
PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging characteristics and artifacts of a nitinol stent with distal tantalum markers with computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vascular phantom was built to simulate in-stent restenosis. A nitinol stent with tantalum markers (Luminexx stent) was evaluated with CT angiography in different orientations relative to the z-axis and with MR angiography in different positions relative to both B0 and the readout gradient. Stenosis measurements were compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography for both modalities. In-stent signal intensity obtained with different flip angles was assessed in two nitinol stents with distal markers (Luminexx stent and SMART stent) and one without markers (Memotherm-FLEXX stent). RESULTS:Stenosis detection was not possible with CT angiography when the stent was perpendicular to the z-axis because of streak-like artifacts induced by tantalum markers. Stenosis evaluation with multiplanar reformation was accurate when the stent was in parallel and oblique orientations relative to the table axis. With MR angiography, metallic artifacts were mostly related to the stent orientation with B0, whereas orientation of the readout gradient had little influence. The mean error (overestimation) for stenosis measurements varied between 0.1% and 7.4% for CT imaging in parallel and oblique positions and 3.6% and 9.5% for MR imaging. Higher flip angles did not improve signal intensity inside the three stents tested. CONCLUSION: CT and MR angiography can be used for evaluating the patency of stents with distal markers that are parallel or oblique relative to the table axis (iliac, carotid, or femoral stents). MR angiography is preferred if the stent is perpendicular to the table axis (renal stent).
Authors: C Sakai; N Sakai; T Okada; T Kuroiwa; H Ishihara; A Morizane; T Yano; H Kikuchi Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Francesco Stilo; Nunzio Montelione; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Marisa Distefano; Francesco Spinelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Fabio Pilato Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2020-10