Literature DB >> 15178718

Relationship between chest port catheter tip position and port malfunction after interventional radiologic placement.

Jakob C L Schutz1, Aalpen A Patel, Timothy W I Clark, Jeffrey A Solomon, David B Freiman, Catherine M Tuite, Jeffrey I Mondschein, Michael C Soulen, Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg, S William Stavropoulos, Andrew Kwak, Jesse L Chittams, Scott O Trerotola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between catheter tip position of implanted subcutaneous chest ports and subsequent port malfunction was investigated. Tip movement from initial supine position to subsequent erect position was also evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent imaging-guided internal jugular chest port placement between July 2001 and May 2003 were identified with use of a quality-assurance database. Sixty-two patients were included in the study (22 men and 40 women), with a mean age of 58 years (range, 27-81 years). Catheter tip location on the intraprocedural chest radiograph was determined with use of two methods. First, the distance from the right tracheobronchial angle (TBA) was recorded (TBA distance). Second, tip location was classified into six anatomic regions: 1, internal jugular veins; 2, brachiocephalic veins; 3, superior vena cava (SVC; n = 11); 4, SVC/right atrial junction (n = 22); 5, upper half of right atrium (n = 25); and 6, lower half of right atrium (n = 4). For the duration of follow-up, catheter tip location was documented, as were all episodes of catheter malfunction.
RESULTS: Patients with catheter tips initially placed in position 3 had a higher risk of port malfunction (four of 11; 36%) than patients with catheter tips located in position 5 (two of 25; 8%). This difference narrowly fell short of statistical significance (P =.057). When comparing intraprocedural chest radiographs to the first erect chest radiographs, significant upward tip movement was noted. The tips migrated cephalad an average of 20 mm (P =.003) and 1.0 position units (P =.001). DISCUSSION: Catheter tips placed in the SVC tended to have a greater risk of port malfunction compared with those positioned in the right atrium. Chest ports migrated cephalad between the supine and erect positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15178718     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000127890.47187.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  14 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

Authors:  Bairbre Connolly; Joao Amaral; Sharon Walsh; Michael Temple; Peter Chait; Derek Stephens
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-07

3.  Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.

Authors:  Jennifer R LaRoy; Sarah B White; Thejus Jayakrishnan; Stephanie Dybul; Dirk Ungerer; Kiran Turaga; Parag J Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Percutaneous endovascular management of chronic superior vena cava syndrome of benign causes : long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Stéphane Breault; Francesco Doenz; Anne-Marie Jouannic; Salah Dine Qanadli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava.

Authors:  Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Yun-Hen Liu; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Long-term outcomes of totally implantable venous access devices.

Authors:  Yi-Chia Wang; Pei-Lin Lin; Wei-Han Chou; Chih-Peng Lin; Chi-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A retrospective clinical study: complications of totally implanted central venous access ports.

Authors:  June Pill Seok; Young Jin Kim; Hyun Min Cho; Han Young Ryu; Wan Jin Hwang; Tae Yun Sung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-05

9.  Safety of a totally implantable central venous port system with percutaneous subclavian vein access.

Authors:  Dong-Yoon Keum; Jae-Bum Kim; Min-Cheol Chae
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-05

10.  Functional evaluation of conventional 'Celsite' venous ports versus 'Vortex' ports with a tangential outlet: a prospective randomised pilot study.

Authors:  G A Goossens; G Verbeeck; P Moons; W Sermeus; I De Wever; M Stas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.