Literature DB >> 15175847

Effect of a case-finding strategy for osteoporosis on bisphosphonate prescribing in primary care.

L S Morrison1, J H Tobias.   

Abstract

Case-selection strategies have been advocated for identifying patients who would benefit from primary care to prevent osteoporosis. However, the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. To address this question, we performed a randomized control trial to determine whether a case-selection strategy to identify patients with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis, combined with open access to dual X-ray absorptometry (DXA) scans, influences bisphosphonate prescribing in ten GP practices in Avon. Practices were randomized to two groups: the first identified women aged 45-75 years at high risk of osteoporosis and provided open access to DXA scans for 12 months; the second had no case-finding strategy and no DXA scan access. Bisphosphonate prescribing was ascertained by searching computerized patient records every 3 months during the intervention and a subsequent 6-month follow-up period. Overall, the number of subjects in each practice who were prescribed bisphosphonates increased by 50% (p<0.001), and the proportion of bisphosphonates prescribed as aminobisphosphonates increased 3-fold (p<0.001). The magnitude of these changes was similar in both groups. However, of the patients prescribed bisphosphonates, approximately twice as many in group 1, as compared with group 2, had a previously documented low-trauma fracture, as assessed at the end of the 12-month intervention period (p=0.01). Furthermore, at study's end, of the 30 patients in group 1 receiving bisphosphonates who had received DXA scans, 80% had osteoporosis as defined by t-score<-2.5. We conclude that use of a case-selection strategy for osteoporosis in primary care, combined with open access to DXA scans, appears to target bisphosphonate therapy to those at high risk of osteoporotic fractures. In contrast, the overall rate of bisphosphonate prescribing is unaffected by this intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175847     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1644-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  An audit of current clinical practice in the management of osteoporosis in Nottingham.

Authors:  O Sahota; A Worley; D J Hosking
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-12

3.  Incidence of distal forearm fracture in British men and women.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; C Cooper; J D Finn; M Lunt; D Purdie; D M Reid; R Rowe; A D Woolf; W A Wallace
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Pins and plaster aren't enough: a call for the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; John P Bilezikian; Mishaela R Rubin; Dennis M Black; Richard S Bockman; Henry G Bone; Marc C Hochberg; Michael R McClung; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Colles fracture, spine fracture, and subsequent risk of hip fracture in men and women. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Philippe Autier; John Collins; Brigitte Velkeniers; Dirk Vanderschueren; Steven Boonen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Prescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; P Dolan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Oral corticosteroid prescribing in women over 50, use of fracture prevention therapy, and bone densitometry service.

Authors:  I W Chantler; M W J Davie; S F Evans; J S Rees
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.

Authors:  S de Lusignan; T Chan; S Wells; A Cooper; M Harvey; S Brew; M Wright
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Bone mineral density measurements: are they worth while?

Authors:  D J Torgerson; C Donaldson; D M Reid
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  6 in total

1.  Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kastner; L Perrier; S E P Munce; C C Adhihetty; A Lau; J Hamid; V Treister; J Chan; Y Lai; S E Straus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by lateral DXA scanning may be cost-effective when used as part of fracture liaison services or primary care screening.

Authors:  E M Clark; L Carter; V C Gould; L Morrison; J H Tobias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The diagnosis and treatment of primary osteoporosis according to current guidelines.

Authors:  Erika Baum; Klaus M Peters
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monika Kastner; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Alendronate increases BMD at appendicular and axial skeletons in patients with established osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Qin; Wingyee Choy; Szeki Au; Musei Fan; Pingchung Leung
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.