Literature DB >> 11192273

An audit of current clinical practice in the management of osteoporosis in Nottingham.

O Sahota1, A Worley, D J Hosking.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is now recognized by the World Health Organization and the Department of Health as a major public health problem. In 1994, the Advisory Group on Osteoporosis (AGO), set up by the Department of Health, recommended that Health Authorities and general practitioner fundholders should purchase bone densitometry services for the management of osteoporosis. The aims of this study were to assess the criteria for requests for bone densitometry from primary care in comparison with the AGO recommendations and to compare the numbers of patients referred with a low-trauma osteoporotic fracture with the expected number of fractures in the Nottingham area.
METHODS: Patient referral data and requests for bone densitometry were collected by case note review of all new patients referred to the Nottingham Osteoporosis Clinic over a 12 month period and then compared with the AGO recommendations. The patients referred with a history of a low-trauma fracture were then compared with the expected incidence of fractures, calculated using age-sex-specific fracture incidence data applied to the Nottingham population Census statistics.
RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were referred to the Osteoporosis Clinic for bone densitometry. Almost two-thirds of the patients had no clinical indicators for requests for scanning, in comparison with the AGO recommendations. Seventy-seven patients were referred with vertebral fracture, 12 hip, 20 colles and 26 other fractures. Using age-sex-specific fracture incidence data applied to the Nottingham population Census statistics, it was estimated that the expected incidence of hip fractures would be 812, distal forearm fractures 514 and vertebral fractures presenting to clinical attention 625. This represents 1.5 per cent of the total hip fractures, 3.9 per cent distal forearm and 12.3 per cent vertebral actually presenting to the Osteoporosis Clinic.
CONCLUSION: Bone densitometry was requested in up to 60 per cent of the patients with no clinical risk factors to warrant bone densitometry. Osteoporosis-related fractures remain unrecognized in clinical practice. The majority of patients do not receive specialist assessment despite being at high risk of future fracture. Further steps are necessary to educate health care professionals in primary and secondary care, but more importantly, to direct services more proactively in those at high risk of future fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11192273     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/22.4.466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  7 in total

1.  A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.

Authors:  D Bliuc; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Whom to treat? The contribution of vertebral X-rays to risk-based algorithms for fracture prediction. Results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; G Armbrecht; D Felsenberg; M Lunt; K Weber; S Boonen; I Jajic; J J Stepan; D Banzer; W Reisinger; J Janott; G Kragl; C Scheidt-Nave; B Felsch; C Matthis; H H Raspe; G Lyritis; G Póor; R Nuti; T Miazgowski; K Hoszowski; J Bruges Armas; A Lopes Vaz; L I Benevolenskaya; P Masaryk; J B Cannata; O Johnell; D M Reid; A Bhalla; A D Woolf; C J Todd; C Cooper; R Eastell; J A Kanis; T W O'Neill; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs.

Authors:  Susan B Jaglal; June Carroll; Gillian Hawker; Warren J McIsaac; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Suzanne M Cadarette; Cathy Cameron; Dave Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions.

Authors:  Charles A Morris; Danielle Cabral; Hailu Cheng; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Identification of risk factors for future fracture in patients following distal forearm fracture.

Authors:  D Mulherin; S Williams; J A Smith; J Edwards; T P Sheeran; T Price
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effect of a case-finding strategy for osteoporosis on bisphosphonate prescribing in primary care.

Authors:  L S Morrison; J H Tobias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Management of osteoporosis and associated quality of life in post menopausal women.

Authors:  Bernard Cortet; Francis Blotman; Françoise Debiais; Dominique Huas; Florence Mercier; Chantal Rousseaux; Véronique Berger; Anne-Françoise Gaudin; François-Emery Cotté
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.