A specific synaptic pathway activates a conditional plateau potential underlying protraction phase in the Aplysia feeding central pattern generator.

A common feature in the architecture of neuronal networks is a high degree of seemingly redundant synaptic connectivity. In many cases, the synaptic inputs converging on any particular neuron all use the same neurotransmitter and appear to be fundamentally equivalent. Here, we analyze a striking counterexample in which such inputs are not equivalent and, as a result, play very different roles in the generation of the pattern of activity produced by the network. In the feeding central pattern generator of Aplysia, the pattern-initiating neuron B50 elicits motor programs by exciting the plateauing neuron B31/B32 in two ways: directly and indirectly through neuron B63. All of the synaptic connections use ACh. Despite the direct input of B50 to B31/B32, the indirect pathway of exciting B31/B32 through B63 is required for B50 to elicit the B31/B32 plateau potential and the motor program. We dissect this requirement using the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist pirenzepine. Pirenzepine blocks the B50-elicited motor program, the plateau potential in B31/B32, and, notably, a slow component of the EPSP elicited in B31/B32 by B63 but not that elicited by B50. The muscarinic agonist oxotremorine restores the plateau potential in B31/B32 and eliminates the necessity for B63 in B50-elicited motor programs. Together, our analysis shows that the plateau potential in B31/B32 is not endogenous but conditional, furthermore conditional on one particular synaptic input, that from B63. Thus, among several inputs to B31/B32 that use the same transmitter, the input from B63 is functionally distinct in its preferential access to the plateau potential that represents the committed step toward the initiation of a motor program.