Literature DB >> 15175178

Breast cancer risk and historical exposure to pesticides from wide-area applications assessed with GIS.

Julia Green Brody1, Ann Aschengrau, Wendy McKelvey, Ruthann A Rudel, Christopher H Swartz, Theresa Kennedy.   

Abstract

Pesticides are of interest in etiologic studies of breast cancer because many mimic estrogen, a known breast cancer risk factor, or cause mammary tumors in animals, but most previous studies have been limited by using one-time tissue measurements of residues of only a few pesticides long banned in the United States. As an alternative method to assess historical exposures to banned and current-use pesticides, we used geographic information system (GIS) technology in a population-based case-control study of 1,165 women residing in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 1988-1995 and 1,006 controls. We assessed exposures dating back to 1948 (when DDT was first used there) from pesticides applied for tree pests (e.g., gypsy moths), cranberry bogs, other agriculture, and mosquito control on wetlands. We found no overall pattern of association between pesticide use and breast cancer. We found modest increases in risk associated with aerial application of persistent pesticides on cranberry bogs and less persistent pesticides applied for tree pests or agriculture. Adjusted odds ratios for these exposures were 1.8 or lower, and, with a few exceptions, confidence intervals did not exclude the null. The study is limited by uncertainty about locations of home addresses (particularly before 1980) and unrecorded tree pest and mosquito control events as well as lack of information about exposures during years when women in the study lived off Cape Cod and about women with potentially important early life exposures on Cape Cod who were not included because they moved away.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175178      PMCID: PMC1242018          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  39 in total

1.  A geographic information assessment of birth weight and crop production patterns around mother's residence.

Authors:  H Xiang; J R Nuckols; L Stallones
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Pesticide exposure of children in an agricultural community: evidence of household proximity to farmland and take home exposure pathways.

Authors:  C Lu; R A Fenske; N J Simcox; D Kalman
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Imputation for exposure histories with gaps, under an excess relative risk model.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; E S Moledor; D M Umbach; D P Sandler
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Identification of occupational cancer risks in British Columbia. A population-based case-control study of 995 incident breast cancer cases by menopausal status, controlling for confounding factors.

Authors:  P R Band; N D Le; R Fang; M Deschamps; R P Gallagher; P Yang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  A population-based case-control study of farming and breast cancer in North Carolina.

Authors:  E J Duell; R C Millikan; D A Savitz; B Newman; J C Smith; M J Schell; D P Sandler
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Repeated measurements of organochlorine exposure and breast cancer risk (Denmark).

Authors:  A P Høyer; T Jørgensen; P Grandjean; H B Hartvig
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Breast cancer and environmental risk factors: epidemiological and experimental findings.

Authors:  M S Wolff; G W Collman; J C Barrett; J Huff
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Cancer risk and residential proximity to cranberry cultivation in Massachusetts.

Authors:  A Aschengrau; D Ozonoff; P Coogan; R Vezina; T Heeren; Y Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a Geographic Information System.

Authors:  M H Ward; J R Nuckols; S J Weigel; S K Maxwell; K P Cantor; R S Miller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Davis; H L Bradlow; M Wolff; T Woodruff; D G Hoel; H Anton-Culver
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  26 in total

1.  Using satellite derived land cover information for a multi-temporal study of self-reported recall of proximity to farmland.

Authors:  Gillian A Avruskin; Jaymie R Meliker; Geoffrey M Jacquez
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Aerial pesticide application causes DNA damage in pilots from Sinaloa, Mexico.

Authors:  C Martínez-Valenzuela; S M Waliszewski; O Amador-Muñoz; E Meza; M E Calderón-Segura; E Zenteno; J Huichapan-Martínez; M Caba; R Félix-Gastélum; R Longoria-Espinoza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The effect of administrative boundaries and geocoding error on cancer rates in California.

Authors:  Daniel W Goldberg; Myles G Cockburn
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-10

Review 4.  The Pine River statement: human health consequences of DDT use.

Authors:  Brenda Eskenazi; Jonathan Chevrier; Lisa Goldman Rosas; Henry A Anderson; Maria S Bornman; Henk Bouwman; Aimin Chen; Barbara A Cohn; Christiaan de Jager; Diane S Henshel; Felicia Leipzig; John S Leipzig; Edward C Lorenz; Suzanne M Snedeker; Darwin Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Self-reported exposure to pesticides in residential settings and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Umar Farooq; Monika Joshi; Vinod Nookala; Pramil Cheriyath; Daniel Fischman; Nora J Graber; Steven D Stellman; Joshua Muscat
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Self-reported chemicals exposure, beliefs about disease causation, and risk of breast cancer in the Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Ann Aschengrau; Ruthann A Rudel; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Relationship between physician supply and breast cancer survival: a geographic approach.

Authors:  Jay M Fleisher; Jennie Q Lou; Maria Farrell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

8.  An effective and efficient approach for manually improving geocoded data.

Authors:  Daniel W Goldberg; John P Wilson; Craig A Knoblock; Beate Ritz; Myles G Cockburn
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Spatial analysis of bladder, kidney, and pancreatic cancer on upper Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to case-control data.

Authors:  Verónica Vieira; Thomas Webster; Janice Weinberg; Ann Aschengrau
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Exposure to fogger trucks and breast cancer incidence in the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: a case-control study.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Susan L Teitelbaum; Mary S Wolff; Steven D Stellman; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.