Literature DB >> 15172853

Identification of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of early-stage cervical cancer patients.

Scott E Lentz1, Laila I Muderspach, Juan C Felix, Wei Ye, Susan Groshen, Charles A Amezcua.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite histologically negative lymph nodes, approximately 15% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer will develop recurrence. Micrometastases have been shown to be important in staging and treatment of breast cancers and melanoma and have been identified by polymerase chain reaction analysis in cervical cancers. This study sought to estimate the frequency of micrometastases identified by immunohistochemistry in histologically negative lymph nodes and compare this to other known risk factors for recurrence of cervical cancer.
METHODS: Early-stage (stages IA2, IB1, and IB2) cervical cancer patients of all histologic subtypes were identified from the surgical logs of the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center for the period 1994-2000. One hundred thirty-two patients had histologically negative lymph nodes. Immunohistochemical assay was performed on 3,106 lymph nodes by using antibodies against cytokeratins AE-1 and CAM 5.2 in combination according to standard protocols. The stained nodes were then evaluated for the presence of micrometastases and compared against the respective clinicopathologic information in each case.
RESULTS: Micrometastases were detected in 19 of 132 (15%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9%, 22%) patients, found in 29 of the 3,106 (0.9%) lymph nodes evaluated. Vascular space invasion was seen in 50 of 132 cases (38%, 95% CI 30%, 47%) and in 8 of 19 (42%, 95% CI 21%, 66%) cases with micrometastases. Surgical margins of the resected specimen were negative in 120 of 132 cases (91%, 95% CI 84%, 95%) and in 16 of 19 (84%, 95%CI 60%, 96%) of those cases with micrometastases. Micrometastases were seen most frequently in pelvic lymph nodes (25 of 29, 86%). Patients with more than 20 lymph nodes removed were more likely to demonstrate metastasis (P <.001). There was no statistically significant association between micrometastasis and vascular space invasion or tumor volume.
CONCLUSION: Micrometastases are identifiable in histologically negative lymph nodes in 15% (95% CI 9%, 22%) of early-stage cancer patients, a frequency which approximates the recurrence rate for patients with negative nodes. In this series, patients with greater numbers of lymph nodes analyzed were more likely to have lymph node micrometastasis identified. There appears to be no relationship between tumor volume and the identification of micrometastases. Although micrometastases can be identified in histologically negative lymph nodes, their presence is not strongly associated with other known factors of cervical cancer recurrence. Further research is needed to determine whether the presence of lymph node micrometastases is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172853     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000125869.78251.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  21 in total

1.  Survival and prognosticators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Masayoshi Hosaka; Hidemichi Watari; Takashi Mitamura; Yousuke Konno; Tetsuji Odagiri; Tatsuya Kato; Mahito Takeda; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Progress in the Study of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Bang-Xing Huang; Fang Fang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Obesity does not affect the number of retrieved lymph nodes and the rate of intraoperative complications in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Mehmet Coskun Salman; Alp Usubutun; Tulay Ozlu; Kubra Boynukalin; Kunter Yuce
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  John P Diaz; Mary L Gemignani; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Kay J Park; Melissa P Murray; Dennis S Chi; Yukio Sonoda; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  [Recommendations for the handling and oncologic pathology report of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease in gynecologic malignancies].

Authors:  L-C Horn; J Einenkel; M Höckel; H Kölbl; F Kommoss; S F Lax; L Riethdorf; H-G Schnürch; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Lymph Node Staging with a Combined Protocol of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and Sentinel Node SPECT/CT: A Prospective Study in Patients with FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias Weissinger; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sergios Gatidis; Stefan Kommoss; Konstantin Nikolaou; Samine Sahbai; Christian la Fougère; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Helmut Dittmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Contribution of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel node biopsy in patients with IB2-IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Chéreau; J-G Feron; M Ballester; C Coutant; C Bezu; R Rouzier; E Touboul; E Daraï
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Ultrastaging of lymph node in uterine cancers.

Authors:  Corinne Bézu; Charles Coutant; Marcos Ballester; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Roman Rouzier; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-21

10.  Combining the negative lymph nodes count with the ratio of positive and removed lymph nodes can better predict the postoperative survival in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Lei Zhang; Jing Tian; Xiubao Ren; Quan Hao
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.