Literature DB >> 15172522

Morphological processing: a comparison between free and bound stem facilitation.

Matthew J Pastizzo1, Laurie B Feldman.   

Abstract

Linguists distinguish between words formed from free stems (e.g., actor: act) and those formed from bound stems (e.g., spectator: spect). In a forward masked priming task, we observed significant morphological facilitation for prime-target pairs that shared either a free (e.g., deform-CONFORM) or a bound (e.g., revive-SURVIVE) stem. Relative to an unrelated baseline, magnitudes of facilitation for free (e.g., form) and bound (e.g., vive) stems were significant and comparable, but relative to an orthographic baseline free stem facilitation was greater than bound stem facilitation. In addition, the magnitude of bound (but not free) stem morphological facilitation correlated with the number of morphological relatives.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172522     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00417-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  3 in total

1.  Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12

2.  Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

3.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.